Johnson v. Panos et al
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: Gus P. Panos and Peter Pan Motors, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv07487
Filed: September 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Donna M Ryu
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Scott Johnson (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 3, 2021. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2021)
November 3, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates by Scott Johnson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service) (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/3/2021) Modified on 11/3/2021 (gba, COURT STAFF).
October 29, 2021 Filing 11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT, PETER PAN MOTORS, INC. TO ANSWER INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 21 DAYS [LR 6-1(a)] filed by Peter Pan Motors, Inc.. (Sidran, David) (Filed on 10/29/2021)
October 22, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. Peter Pan Motors, Inc. served on 10/12/2021, answer due 11/2/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/22/2021)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 9/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 28, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2021)
September 28, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Scott Johnson.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/28/2021)
September 28, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Gus P. Panos, Peter Pan Motors, Inc. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2021)
September 28, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2021)
September 27, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/12/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2021)
September 27, 2021 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/27/2021)
September 27, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Scott Johnson re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/27/2021)
September 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16431846.). Filed byScott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/27/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Panos et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gus P. Panos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Pan Motors, Inc.
Represented By: David Robert Sidran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?