Surber et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Gina Surber and Merle Malakoff
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc., Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics Ltd. and Peter Callandar
Case Number: 4:2021cv07621
Filed: September 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Smith & Nephew, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,, (Shaw, John) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 29, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Smith & Nephew, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,, (Shaw, John) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 29, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-20-587927. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16443403). Filed bySmith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of J. Shaw ISO Removal, #2 Exhibit A to Dec of J. Shaw, #3 Exhibit B to Dec of J. Shaw, #4 Exhibit C to Dec of J. Shaw, #5 Exhibit D to Dec of J. Shaw, #6 Exhibit E to Dec of J. Shaw, #7 Exhibit F to Dec of J. Shaw, #8 Exhibit G to Dec of J. Shaw, #9 Exhibit H to Dec of J. Shaw, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shaw, John) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 29, 2021 #Electronic filing error. Nature of Suit not selected on Civil Cover Sheet, please correct and file only an Amended Civil Cover Sheet. Re: #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Smit h & Nephew, Inc. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Surber et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Surber
Represented By: Christopher B. Dolan
Represented By: Dianna L. Albini
Represented By: Megan Rosina Irish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Merle Malakoff
Represented By: Christopher B. Dolan
Represented By: Dianna L. Albini
Represented By: Megan Rosina Irish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Represented By: John W. Shaw
Represented By: Litsa Georgantopoulos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Callandar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?