Alvarado v. CL Media Holdings LLC
| Jose Alvarado |
| CL Media Holdings LLC doing business as Wild Sky Media |
| 4:2021cv07960 |
| October 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer to Complaint by CL Media Holdings LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moses, Stephen) (Filed on 12/7/2021) |
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar finding as moot #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties may "stipulate in writing, without a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint . . . provided the change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order." Because the Court has not yet issued a scheduling order, the parties' stipulation was effective when filed. The parties' request for a court order is denied as moot. The parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Court's local rules. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 4, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jstlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2021)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Jose Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 11/3/2021) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 1/28/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/1/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advanc ed notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at JSTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than January 31, 2022 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 1/28/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/1/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2021) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 11/3/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2021)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2021) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jose Alvarado.. (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 11/2/2021) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/12/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/12/2021. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jose Alvarado. CL Media Holdings LLC served on 10/13/2021, answer due 11/3/2021. (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Jont Case Management Statement due by 1/3/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2022 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CL Media Holdings LLC. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/26/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2021) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding a Copyright (cc: form mailed to register). (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 10/11/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 10/11/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against CL Media Holdings LLC, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-16484260). Filed by Jose Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 10/11/2021) Modified on 10/12/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alvarado v. CL Media Holdings LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jose Alvarado | |
| Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CL Media Holdings LLC doing business as Wild Sky Media | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Louis Moses |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
