Farr v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
Plaintiff: Cynthia Farr
Defendant: Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
Case Number: 4:2021cv08099
Filed: October 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey S White
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 754
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2021 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Service waived by Pacific Gas and Electric Co., waiver sent on 10/24/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. (Rodriguez, Bianca) (Filed on 11/19/2021) Modified on 11/19/2021 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
November 19, 2021 #Electronic filing error. The text has been modified to reflect PG&E waived service of the summons, NOT Cynthia Farr, the plaintiff in the action. Corrected by Clerk' s Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #6 Waiver of Service Executed, filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2021)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/28/21. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/7/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/14/2022 11:00 AM in Oakland, - Telephonic Only.This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 1-888-684-8852Access Code: 8583698The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2021)
October 21, 2021 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/7/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/14/2022 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021)
October 20, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2021)
October 18, 2021 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Cynthia Farr Re: #1 Complaint filed by Cynthia Farr. (Bothwell, Anthony) (Filed on 10/18/2021)
October 18, 2021 #Electronic filing error. Discrepancy re Nature of suit. Docketed as 442 and civil cover sheet marked as 790. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet with nature of suit 442. No j udge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Complaint filed by Cynthia Farr (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2021)
October 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16505375.). Filed byCynthia Farr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bothwell, Anthony) (Filed on 10/16/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farr v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Farr
Represented By: Anthony P. X. Bothwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
Represented By: Bianca Monique Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?