Jose Cruz Miyake v. Merrick B. Garland et.al.
Defendant: Merrick B Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Robert Looney and Merrick B. Garland
Petitioner: Jose Cruz Miyake
Case Number: 4:2021cv08323
Filed: October 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2021 Filing 13 Certified copy of Remand Order and docket sheet mailed to United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #11 Stipulation Remanding Case to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1447(b).(mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 15, 2021 Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation Remanding Case to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1447(b) and [Proposed] Order filed by Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Robert Looney, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 12/15/2021)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 11/30/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2021)
November 30, 2021 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2021)
November 29, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jose Cruz Miyake.. (Ballout, Haitham) (Filed on 11/29/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Robert Looney, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF NON-PAYMENT Please be advised that the filing fee has not been received in this case. The fee must be paid within two business days or the case will be subject to termination. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by November 29, 2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
October 27, 2021 #Electronic filing error. Filing fee not paid. Please pay the filing fee through Pay.gov by clicking on Civil > Other Documents > New Case Filing Fee in CM/ECF. [err701] Re: #1 Complaint filed by Jose Cruz Miyake (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2021) Modified text on 10/29/2021 (Regenerate NEFs) (cv, COURT STAFF).
October 26, 2021 b Filing fee paid: $ 402.00, receipt number ACANDC-16549373. (Finance unit verified that payment was received) (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2021) Modified on 11/19/2021 (bw, COURT STAFF).
October 26, 2021 Filing 6 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2021)
October 26, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/9/2021. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2021)
October 26, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Ballout, Haitham) (Filed on 10/26/2021)
October 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Jose Cruz Miyake against All Defendants. Filed byJose Cruz Miyake. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ballout, Haitham) (Filed on 10/26/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Cruz Miyake v. Merrick B. Garland et.al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Cruz Miyake
Represented By: Haitham E. Ballout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Looney
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?