Smith v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC et al
| Jasmine Smith |
| GlaxoSmithKline, PLC and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare |
| 4:2021cv09390 |
| December 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER RE: #12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on 1/5/2022. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2022)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO #1 COMPLAINT filed by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT)(Minahan, Michael) (Filed on 1/4/2022) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jasmine Smith. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare served on 12/22/2021, answer due 1/12/2022. (Fisher, L.) (Filed on 1/4/2022) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jasmine Smith. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC served on 12/21/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. (Fisher, L.) (Filed on 1/4/2022) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/8/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advance d notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at JSTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than March 7, 2022 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom /. Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/8/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2021) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 12/7/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2021)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jasmine Smith.. (Fisher, L.) (Filed on 12/6/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Defendants GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Initial Case Management Statement due by 3/3/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/10/2022 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/20/2021. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Fisher, L.) (Filed on 12/3/2021) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-16688413). Filed by Jasmine Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fisher, L.) (Filed on 12/3/2021) Modified on 12/6/2021 (tn, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
