Signorello v. National Surety Corporation
Plaintiff: Raymond Signorello doing business as Signorello Estate
Defendant: National Surety Corporation
Claimant: Raymond Signorello
Case Number: 4:2021cv09452
Filed: December 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2021 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case Management Statement due by 3/7/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2021)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 12/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2021)
December 21, 2021 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2021)
December 21, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Raymond Signorello.. (Labar, Ivo) (Filed on 12/21/2021)
December 21, 2021 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Raymond Signorello (Labar, Ivo) (Filed on 12/21/2021)
December 21, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by National Surety Corporation.. (Feldman, Marc) (Filed on 12/21/2021)
December 8, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/7/2022 01:30 PM. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 8, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by National Surety Corporation re 3 Case Assigned by Intake,,, and Standing Orders (Feldman, Marc) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 8, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/22/2021. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 8, 2021 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by National Surety Corporation. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 7, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by National Surety Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet, and Notice of Interested Parties (Feldman, Marc) (Filed on 12/7/2021)
December 7, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Napa County Superior Court. Their case number is 21CV001277. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-16696354). Filed byNational Surety Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Interested Parties)(Feldman, Marc) (Filed on 12/7/2021) Modified on 12/8/2021 (bns, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Signorello v. National Surety Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Surety Corporation
Represented By: Marc Jeremy Feldman
Represented By: Peter Hans Klee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Raymond Signorello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Signorello doing business as Signorello Estate
Represented By: Ivo Labar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?