Beasley v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.
| Brenda Beasley |
| Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. |
| 4:2022cv00579 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Jeffrey S White |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent Allen Gerome (Gerome, Brent) (Filed on 3/23/2022) |
| Filing 11 ASSOCIATION of Counsel Brent Gerome, Esq. by Brenda Beasley. (Gerome, Brent) (Filed on 3/23/2022) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 02/01/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2022)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2022) |
| Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/22/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/29/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2022) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C... (Law, Alan) (Filed on 1/31/2022) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. re 5 Case Assigned by Intake,, Standing Order Regarding Covid-19 Procedures, Civil Case Standing Orders For Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero;Exhibit Tag; Standing Order for All Judges; ADR Handbook, Blank Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting ADR Process; Blank Request for ADR Phone Conference; Blank Joint Case Management Statement (Law, Alan) (Filed on 1/28/2022) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/11/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2022) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byLongs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.. (Law, Alan) (Filed on 1/28/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. identifying Corporate Parent CVS Health Corporation, Other Affiliate CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.. re #2 Jury Demand, #1 Notice of Removal, (Law, Alan) (Filed on 1/28/2022) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.. (Law, Alan) (Filed on 1/28/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL To United States District Court Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1332 and 1441(B) from Alameda Superior Court. Their case number is 21CV003232. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-16849260). Filed byLongs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Law, Alan) (Filed on 1/28/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beasley v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brenda Beasley | |
| Represented By: | Brent Allen Gerome |
| Represented By: | Rastin C. Ashtiani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Alan Frank Law |
| Represented By: | Derek Shane Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
