Krisitch et al v. BNSF Railway Company
Jeffrey Wayne Krisitch and Diana Jo Kristich |
BNSF Railway Company |
4:2022cv01332 |
March 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Kandis A Westmore |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #8 Stipulation for Dismissal. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal filed by BNSF Railway Company, Diana Jo Kristich and Jeffrey Wayne Krisitch. (Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/22/2022) Modified on 3/23/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by BNSF Railway Company.. (Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/9/2022) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/31/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/7/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by BNSF Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Company for BNSF Railway Company. (Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/3/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. All names of interested entities or person MUST be entered at the prompt. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety.Re: #3 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by BNSF Railway Company (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2022) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/16/2022. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2022) |
Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by BNSF Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC for BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/2/2022) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/2/2022) Modified on 3/3/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Contra Costa Superior Court. Their case number is C21-02448. (Filing fee $402 receipt number BCANDC-16954836). Filed by BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/2/2022) Modified on 3/3/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.