The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc. et al
The Reckstin Family Trust, Dennis Martinez, Christie Sweeney, Mark Samarghandi, Elizabeth Wensel, Sharon L. Zavalanski and David Linder |
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Siebel, David Barter, Patricia A. House, Richard Levin, Michael G. McCaffery, Nehal Raj, Condoleezza Rice, S. Shankar Sastry, Bruce Sewell, Lorenzo Simonelli, Stephen M. Ward Jr., C3, Inc., Baker Hughes Company, Edward Y. Abbo, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, BofA Securities, Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Canaccord Genuity LLC, JMP Securities LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Needham & Company, LLC, Piper Sandler & Co. and Wedbush Securities Inc. |
Yining Cai, Leonard Janos, Fadi Karnaby, Hossein Y. Afshari, David Hu, Li Zhong Hu and Sravan Potu |
4:2022cv01413 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.