Gomez v. Jackson Family Wines, Inc.,
| Andres Gomez |
| Jackson Family Wines, Inc., |
| 4:2022cv01974 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint (Joint) Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Jackson Family Wines, Inc.,. (Arceo, Alvin) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andres Gomez.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 4/4/2022) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Cara Patricia Townsend (Townsend, Cara) (Filed on 4/4/2022) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaina Duggal (Duggal, Aaina) (Filed on 4/4/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Jackson Family Wines, Inc. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/11/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2022) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 3/28/2022) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Andres Gomez re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 3/28/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17034385.). Filed byAndres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 3/28/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gomez v. Jackson Family Wines, Inc., | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andres Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Lockhart Seabock |
| Represented By: | Aaina Duggal |
| Represented By: | Elliott Charles Montgomery |
| Represented By: | Cara Patricia Townsend |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jackson Family Wines, Inc., | |
| Represented By: | Alvin Arceo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
