Grancsay v. Monterey Financial Services Inc.
| Gail A. Grancsay |
| Monterey Financial Services Inc. |
| 4:2022cv02014 |
| March 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/11/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygr General Order 58. Pe rsons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/11/2022 0 2:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2022) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 04/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2022)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2022) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Gail A. Grancsay.. (Wajda, Nicholas) (Filed on 4/14/2022) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Gail A. Grancsay. Service waived by Monterey Financial Services Inc. waiver sent on 4/13/2022, answer due 6/13/2022. (Wajda, Nicholas) (Filed on 4/14/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/28/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/5/2022 02:00 PM in McKinleyville. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/14/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2022) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Gail A. Grancsay (Amended). (Wajda, Nicholas) (Filed on 3/31/2022) |
| Filing 2 Clerk is unable to randomly assign case at this time. Attorney of Record has been contacted regarding the filing of Amended Civil Cover Sheet indicating correct Divisional Assignment Selection re #1 Complaint (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monterey Financial Services Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17038453.). Filed byGail A. Grancsay. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wajda, Nicholas) (Filed on 3/29/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grancsay v. Monterey Financial Services Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gail A. Grancsay | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Michal Wajda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monterey Financial Services Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
