Webb v. Dunkin et al
Anthony L. Webb |
E. Shedxi Dunkin and D. Shdgil Loubal |
4:2022cv02040 |
March 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC CHC |
Jon S Tigar |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter dated 4/15/2022 from Anthony L. Webb. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Grievance form, #2 Attachments re: IFP deficiency notice)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2022) Modified on 5/3/2022 (slh, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 5 Letter dated 3/29/22 from Anthony Webb. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2022) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 5/6/2022. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Stay filed by Anthony L. Webb. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022) |
Filing 2 Letter dated 3/19/2022 from Anthony L. Webb. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E. Shedxi Dunkin, D. Shdgil Loubal (Filing fee: due). Filed by Anthony L. Webb. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.