Jackson v. Norris
| Lawrence Jackson |
| David Norris |
| 4:2022cv02919 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 6, 2022. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/12/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/19/2022 11:00 AM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsw Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argumen t at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at jswcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than August 18, 2022 at 12:00 PM PST.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (dts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 07/06/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/6/2022. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive for mailing on 7/6/2022.
|
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re REVIEW UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915. Objections due within 14 days of Plaintiff's receipt of a copy of this Report and Recommendation. The Case Management Conferences set for August 19, 2022 is vacated. THIS CASE SHALL BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on July 5, 2022. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive for mailing on 7/6/2022 Modified on 7/6/2022 (klh, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and ordering Plaintiff to show cause why complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff's response or amended complaint shall be filed by June 29, 2022. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy mailed on 5/26/2022 Modified on 5/26/2022 (klh, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/12/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/19/2022 02:00 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lawrence Jackson. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2022) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lawrence Jackson. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Norris. (IFPP) No Process. Filed byLawrence Jackson. Consent/Declination due by 5/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Norris | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lawrence Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Norris | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
