The Regents of the University of California et al v. Getinge USA Sales, LLC et al
The Regents of the University of California and The Travelers Indemnity Company |
Getinge USA Sales, LLC and Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD |
4:2022cv02945 |
May 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Sallie Kim |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ANSWER TO CROSSCLAIM #16 Answer to Complaint, Crossclaim , COUNTERCLAIM against Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD byGetinge USA Sales, LLC. (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 7/12/2022) |
Filing 20 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD identifying Corporate Parent Tuttnauer Ltd for Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD, Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD. (Thames, Jonathan) (Filed on 6/27/2022) |
Filing 19 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD identifying Corporate Parent Tuttnauer Ltd for Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD, Tuttanuer USA Co. LTD. (Thames, Jonathan) (Filed on 6/27/2022) |
Filing 18 Certificate of Interested Entities by The Regents of the University of California, The Travelers Indemnity Company identifying Corporate Parent The Travelers Indemnity Company, Other Affiliate Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Other Affiliate Travelers Insurance Group Holdings Inc. for The Travelers Indemnity Company. (Sanchez, Jennifer) (Filed on 6/22/2022) |
Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Regents of the University of California, The Travelers Indemnity Company identifying Corporate Parent Travelers Insurance Group Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Other Affiliate The Travelers Companies, Inc. for The Travelers Indemnity Company. (Sanchez, Jennifer) (Filed on 6/22/2022) |
Filing 16 TUTTNAUER USA CO. LTD. ANSWER to Complaint FILED BY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., First CROSSCLAIM against Getinge USA Sales, LLC byTuttanuer USA Co. LTD. (Thames, Jonathan) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
![]() |
![]() |
*** #11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Terminated, Re-filed as Docket No. #18 .*** (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2022) |
Filing 13 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17216135.) Filing fee previously paid on 5/27/22 filed by Getinge USA Sales, LLC. (Hatten, Madison) (Filed on 5/27/2022) |
Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE DOCKET NO. #11 . Your address on the application is a partial address. Please re-file a new application with your complete address reflected on it. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2022) |
Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17216135.) filed by Getinge USA Sales, LLC. (Hatten, Madison) (Filed on 5/27/2022) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for August 23, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by August 16th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-02945-HSG. The August 23rd proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
![]() |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2022) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Getinge USA Sales, LLC.. (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 5/24/2022) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Getinge USA Sales, LLC re 4 Case Assigned by Intake,, #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, served 5/23/22 (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 5/24/2022) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/15/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/22/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/1/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2022) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Getinge USA Sales, LLC re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 5/18/2022) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Getinge USA Sales, LLC (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 5/18/2022) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-22-599204. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17188028). Filed byGetinge USA Sales, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Emily Weisswenberger ISO Removal, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 5/18/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.