Oiyemhonlan v. Aramark Management Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Raymond Oiyemhonlan
Defendant: Aramark Management Services, Inc. and Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv02954
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #14 MOTION for Joinder of California Defendants ) filed byAramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Management Services, Inc.. (Riechert, Melinda) (Filed on 7/13/2022)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Set Hearing as to Re Docket No. #14 , See Docket No. #16 . Motion Hearing set for 12/1/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPLY (re #10 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court ) IN SUPPORT OF MOTION filed byRaymond Oiyemhonlan. (Varlack, Tiega) (Filed on 7/6/2022)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE by Raymond Oiyemhonlan re #14 MOTION for Joinder of California Defendants, 15 Clerk's Notice, Hearing Date December 1, 2022 (Varlack, Tiega) (Filed on 7/6/2022)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that counsel must re-notice not re-file the #14 Motion for Joinder. Hearing date of October 13, 2022 is not available. Counsel is directed to check the Court's scheduling notes before re-noticing the motions for a new hearing date. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2022)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Joinder of California Defendants filed by Raymond Oiyemhonlan. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Varlack, Tiega) (Filed on 6/29/2022)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court ) filed byAramark Facility Services, LLC. (Riechert, Melinda) (Filed on 6/29/2022)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Reset Hearing as to #10 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court, See Docket No. #12 : Motion Hearing set for 10/13/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2022)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE by Raymond Oiyemhonlan re #10 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court of Motion (Varlack, Tiega) (Filed on 6/21/2022)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that counsel must properly notice the motion for hearing. Hearing date of October 13, 2022, is vacated because the motion was not noticed for this date. The briefing schedule remains in effect. The motion should not be re-filed. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2022)
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Raymond Oiyemhonlan. Motion Hearing set for 10/13/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 6/29/2022. Replies due by 7/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Varlack, Tiega) (Filed on 6/15/2022)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for August 23, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by August 16, 2022. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-02954-HSG. The August 23, 2022 proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Judge Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 05/23/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Aramark Facility Services, LLC re 3 Case Assigned by Intake,, (Riechert, Melinda) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Aramark Facility Services, LLC.. (Riechert, Melinda) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/12/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/19/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint byAramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Management Services, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/1/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2022)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Aramark Facility Services, LLC re 1 Notice of Removal,, Declaration of Amy Golembo in Support of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet (Riechert, Melinda) (Filed on 5/18/2022)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Civil Action to United States District Court by Defendant Aramark Facility Services LLC - Diversity of Citizenship from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-22-598692. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17188969). Filed byAramark Facility Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer, #3 Declaration of Amy Golembo in Support of Defendant Aramark Facility Services, LLC's Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Riechert, Melinda) (Filed on 5/18/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oiyemhonlan v. Aramark Management Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Oiyemhonlan
Represented By: M. Alieu Iscandari
Represented By: Tiega Noel Varlack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Management Services, Inc.
Represented By: Melinda S. Riechert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Represented By: Melinda S. Riechert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?