59 Carol Lane, LP v. Tinsley
| 59 Carol Lane, LP |
| Jolene Tinsley |
| 4:2022cv03959 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Alex G Tse |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #3 Motion to Remand; adopting Report and Recommendations as to #10 Report and Recommendations.. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the hearing regarding #12 Motion to Amend is VACATED. Hearing date of September 29, 2022, is vacated due to the date being listed on Judge Tigar's calendar as unavailable to further settings. The briefing schedule remains in effect. Counsel is directed to check the Judge's webpage on the Court's website regarding scheduling before re-noticing the motion for a new hearing date. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Dismiss filed by 59 Carol Lane, LP. Motion Hearing set for 9/29/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 9/16/2022. Replies due by 9/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Singh, Puneet) (Filed on 9/2/2022) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 08/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION regarding #3 motion to remand by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Objections due by 8/29/2022. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jolene Tinsley. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by 59 Carol Lane, LP.. (Singh, Puneet) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 7 CLERKS NOTICE RESCHEDULING MOTION HEARING: The parties are hereby notified that the hearing on Plaintiffs motion to remand #10 is rescheduled from August 19, 2022 to September 2, 2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/agt A>General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 8/9/2022. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by 59 Carol Lane, LP re #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Dismiss (Singh, Puneet) (Filed on 7/29/2022) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jolene Tinsley re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2022) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Remand , MOTION to Dismiss filed by 59 Carol Lane, LP. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Responses due by 8/10/2022. Replies due by 8/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Puneet Singh ISO Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Cross Complaint and Answer and Remand, #2 Proposed Order)(Singh, Puneet) (Filed on 7/27/2022) Modified on 7/27/2022 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Firm name and address for attorney Puneet Kaur Singh has been updated as the docket shows that he is with the law firm of Kimball Tirey & St. John. Attorney is reminded to update the ECF account if there's any change of firm name or address. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Dismiss filed by 59 Carol Lane, LP. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2022) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/30/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/7/2022 02:00 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa County Superior Court. Their case number is PS 22-0503. ( Filing fee $402, Receipt # 34611160300 ). Filed byJolene Tinsley. Consent/Declination due by 7/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Answer to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Receipt for filing fee)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: 59 Carol Lane, LP v. Tinsley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: 59 Carol Lane, LP | |
| Represented By: | Puneet Kaura Singh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jolene Tinsley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
