Cote v. Office of the California State Controller et al
Plaintiff: Alexander Cote
Defendant: Office of the California State Controller and Betty T. Yee
Not Classified By Court: Alison Cole-Kelly
Case Number: 4:2022cv04056
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Referring Judge: Alex G Tse
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2022 Filing 41 Proposed Order Plaintiffs Alexander Cote and Jennifer I. Sykes's Notice of Filing of [Proposed] Order re: Consolidated Briefing Schedule and Hearing Dates for the Pending Motions by Alexander Cote. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Byrd, Rachele) (Filed on 8/30/2022)
August 17, 2022 Filing 40 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the initial case management conference, previously set for August 23, 2022, is continued to November 17, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA to be held along with the hearing on the (docket no. 24 in case no. 22-cv-024841-HSG) motion to consolidate cases. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022)
August 16, 2022 Filing 39 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Alexander Cote. (Byrd, Rachele) (Filed on 8/16/2022)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #37 Stipulation to Continue Briefing on Pending Motions. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2022)
August 12, 2022 Filing 37 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Briefing on Pending Motions filed by Office of the California State Controller, Betty T. Yee. (Russell, Jay) (Filed on 8/12/2022)
August 11, 2022 Filing 36 Certificate of Interested Entities by Alexander Cote (Byrd, Rachele) (Filed on 8/11/2022)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #33 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Rifkin, Mark. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022)
August 9, 2022 Filing 34 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. #33 . All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-04056-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022)
August 8, 2022 Filing 33 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17421626.) filed by Alexander Cote. (Rifkin, Mark) (Filed on 8/8/2022)
August 5, 2022 Filing 32 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Office of the California State Controller, Betty T. Yee. Motion Hearing set for 12/1/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 8/19/2022. Replies due by 8/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Defendants California State Controller's Office and Betty T. Yee's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Russell, Jay) (Filed on 8/5/2022)
July 28, 2022 Filing 31 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for August 23, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., to be heard concurrently with the case management conference in case no. 22-cv-02841-HSG. The August 23rd proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2022)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case Signed by The Clerk on 07/25/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER RELATING CASE. Docket No. #28 Terminated, Opposition Mis-filed as a Motion. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/25/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
July 22, 2022 Filing 28 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Objecting to Relating Cases filed by Alison Cole-Kelly. Responses due by 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Kornhauser, Samuel) (Filed on 7/22/2022)
July 12, 2022 Filing 27 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/7/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/14/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2022)
July 12, 2022 Filing 26 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:22-cv-03630. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [ECF NO. 24] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Transferring case to Northern District of California. Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
June 29, 2022 Filing 24 STIPULATION to Transfer Case to U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California filed by Defendants Office of the California State Controller, Betty T. Yee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jay C Russell added to party Office of the California State Controller(pty:dft), Attorney Jay C Russell added to party Betty T. Yee(pty:dft))(Russell, Jay)
June 25, 2022 Filing 23 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE MAAME EWUSI-MENSAH FRIMPONG. (kd)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong: granting #18 Non-Resident Attorney Arthur T. Susman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Alexander Cote, designating Berry M. Anderson as local counsel. (yl)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong: granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin Y. Kaufman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Alexander Cote, designating Berry M. Anderson as local counsel. (yl)
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-03630-MEMF (AGRx). (et) Modified on 6/16/2022 (et).
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-03630-RSWL-AGRx. (aco)
June 7, 2022 Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Arthur T. Susman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Alexander Cote (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33428649) filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Byrd, Rachele)
June 7, 2022 Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin Y. Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Alexander Cote (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 6/3/2022, Receipt No. 3341112105) filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Byrd, Rachele)
June 6, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin Y. Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Alexander Cote (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 6/3/2022, Receipt No. 3341112105) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Proposed Order has not been flattened and is causing a corruption with the filing. Other error(s) with document(s): Attorney filed a Notice of Withdrawal of PHV application on 6/3/22, Dkt. #15 . (lt)
June 3, 2022 Filing 15 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64), #14 filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote. (Byrd, Rachele)
June 3, 2022 Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin Y. Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Alexander Cote (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 6/3/2022, Receipt No. 3341112105) filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear Pro Hac Vice) (Byrd, Rachele)
June 3, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #11 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proof of Service was not made pursuant to FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) as service was not made by the Court In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb)
June 2, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote, upon Defendant Betty T. Yee served on 6/1/2022, answer due 6/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Byrd, Rachele)
June 2, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote, upon Plaintiff Office of the California State Controller served on 5/31/2022, answer due 6/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Byrd, Rachele)
May 27, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Arthur Susman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
May 27, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin Y. Kaufman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
May 27, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Office of the California State Controller, Betty T. Yee. (lh)
May 27, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
May 27, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
May 27, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh)
May 26, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote, (Byrd, Rachele)
May 26, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote. (Byrd, Rachele)
May 26, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote. (Byrd, Rachele)
May 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 05/26/2022, receipt number ACACDC-33370091), filed by Plaintiff Alexander Cote. (Attorney Rachele R Byrd added to party Alexander Cote(pty:pla))(Byrd, Rachele)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cote v. Office of the California State Controller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexander Cote
Represented By: Rachele R. Byrd
Represented By: Arthur T. Susman
Represented By: Benjamin Y. Kaufman
Represented By: Betsy C Manifold
Represented By: M. Anderson Berry
Represented By: Oana Constantin
Represented By: Mark Carl Rifkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the California State Controller
Represented By: Jay C Russell
Represented By: Jay Craig Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Betty T. Yee
Represented By: Jay C Russell
Represented By: Jay Craig Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Alison Cole-Kelly
Represented By: Samuel Kornhauser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?