Ualat v. The American Bottling Company et al
Joash Ualat |
The American Bottling Company, Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. and DOES 1-10, |
4:2022cv04184 |
July 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Kandis A Westmore |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company.. (Doucette, Bradley) (Filed on 8/1/2022) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Joash Ualat.. (Pyle, Hunter) (Filed on 7/29/2022) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company Amended [Signed] Certificate of Service (Doucette, Bradley) (Filed on 7/20/2022) |
Filing 8 *Filing Error. See dkt #9 for Corrections*CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company (Doucette, Bradley) (Filed on 7/20/2022) Modified on 7/20/2022 (sfb, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10/11/20 22. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/18/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2022) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/1/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint (see Exhibit F of Removal Complaint) byKeurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company re 1 Notice of Removal, (Whang, Daniel) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company re 1 Notice of Removal, (Whang, Daniel) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 3 Declaration of Daniel Whang in Support of 1 Notice of Removal, filed byKeurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company. (Related document(s) 1 ) (Whang, Daniel) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 2 Declaration of John Tynan in Support of 1 Notice of Removal, filed byKeurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company. (Related document(s) 1 ) (Whang, Daniel) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Alameda. Their case number is 22CV012252. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17361461). Filed byKeurig Dr. Pepper Inc., The American Bottling Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Whang, Daniel) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.