C.C. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
| C.C. and Clint Choice |
| Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Snap, Inc., Tiktok Inc. and ByteDance Inc. |
| 4:2022cv04709 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Rosemarie Theresa Ring NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT META PLATFORMS, INC. (Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 4/19/2023) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley Margaret Simonsen (Simonsen, Ashley) (Filed on 4/11/2023) |
| Filing 17 COMPLAINT Master Short Form Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants. Filed byClint Choice. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garrett, Laura) (Filed on 4/3/2023) |
| Filing 16 Transcript of Proceedings held on 11/09/2022, before Judge Gonzalez Rogers. Court Reporter Irene L. Rodriguez, email address Irene_Rodriguez@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing., TRANSCRIPT COPY DELIVERED Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/15/2023. (Rodriguez, Irene) (Filed on 11/17/2022) |
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE. This case is reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for coordination with In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products, No. 4:22-md-03047 consistent with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Transfer Order and the Order Setting Initial Conference in this District. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2022) |
| Filing 14 TRANSFER ORDER from Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, that the action is transferred to the Northern District of California creating MDL No. 3047 (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2022) |
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting #11 STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JPML RULING. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristin A. Linsley for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (Linsley, Kristin) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Proceedings Pending JPML Ruling filed by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by Meta Platforms, Inc. (Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Meta Platforms, Inc. (Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rosemarie Theresa Ring for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by C.C. ByteDance Inc. served on 8/24/22, answer due 9/14/22, Meta Platforms, Inc. served on 8/24/22, answer due 9/14/22, Snap, Inc. served on 8/23/22, answer due 9/13/22, Tiktok Inc. served on 8/23/22, answer due 9/13/22 . (Attachments: #1 Summons Meta, #2 Summons Snap, #3 Summons TikTok)(Garrett, Laura) (Filed on 9/2/2022) Modified on 9/2/2022 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Filer is reminded to enter the date served on defendants. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #7 Summons Retur ned Executed, filed by C.C. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to ByteDance Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., Snap, Inc., Tiktok Inc. (Attachments: #1 Meta Platforms, Inc., #2 Snap, Inc., #3 Tiktok Inc.)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 11/21/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/28/2022 02:00 PM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by C.C... (Garrett, Laura) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Meta, #2 Snap, #3 TikTok)(Garrett, Laura) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ByteDance Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., Snap, Inc., Tiktok Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17449542.). Filed byC.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garrett, Laura) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
