California River Watch v. Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District
| California River Watch |
| Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District |
| 4:2022cv04800 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 Clean Water Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice [FRCP Section 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by California River Watch (Silver, Jack) (Filed on 8/24/2022) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS [L.R. 3-15] filed by California River Watch (Silver, Jack) (Filed on 8/23/2022) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by California River Watch.. (Silver, Jack) (Filed on 8/23/2022) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2022) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/15/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/22/2022 at 1:30 PM in Oakland - To be determined. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/6/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Silver, Jack) (Filed on 8/22/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Injunctive Relief, Civil Penalties and Declaratory Relief against Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17463176). Filed by California River Watch. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A, #(2) Civil Cover Sheet)(Silver, Jack) (Filed on 8/22/2022) Modified on 8/22/2022 (tn, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: California River Watch v. Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: California River Watch | |
| Represented By: | Jack Silver |
| Represented By: | David Jonathan Weinsoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
