Sepulveda Hernandez v. Rogers et al
| Francisco Javier Sepulveda Hernandez |
| Debra A. Rogers and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 4:2022cv04979 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Francisco Javier Sepulveda Hernandez re #12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Petition for Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act (Nightingale, Zachary) (Filed on 10/17/2022) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Petition for Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act by Francisco Javier Sepulveda Hernandez (Nightingale, Zachary) (Filed on 10/17/2022) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Francisco Javier Sepulveda Hernandez. Debra A. Rogers served on 9/12/2022, answer due 11/14/2022; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 9/12/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Nightingale, Zachary) (Filed on 9/12/2022) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Francisco Javier Sepulveda Hernandez re #9 Clerk's Notice,,,,, Util - Teleconference Zoom,,,, #5 Summons Issued as to USA, #4 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, #8 Order Reassigning Case,,, Case Assigned/Reassigned,, #1 Complaint, #6 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge, #2 Proposed Summons, 7 Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only,,, 3 Case Assigned by Intake,, (Nightingale, Zachary) (Filed on 9/12/2022) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/5/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/12/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygr General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/5/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/12/20 22 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2022) |
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 09/02/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2022) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Francisco Javier Sepulveda Hernandez.. (Nightingale, Zachary) (Filed on 8/31/2022) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2022) |
| Filing 4 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/14/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Nightingale, Zachary) (Filed on 8/31/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act against Debra A. Rogers, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17494656.). Filed byFrancisco Javier Sepulveda Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration with exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nightingale, Zachary) (Filed on 8/31/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
