Laufer v. VMware, Inc. et al
| Chana Laufer |
| VMware, Inc., Nicole Anasenes, Anthony Bates, Marianne Brown, Michael Brown, Michael Dell, Kenneth Denman, Egon Durban, Karen Dykstra, Rangarajan Raghuram and Paul Sagan |
| 4:2022cv05146 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Chana Laufer.. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 9/29/2022) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE: Counsel is notified to refile Consent/Declination #8 with attorney of Record Joel Elkins' signature or Michael Rogovin will need to file a notice of appearance, and if necessary a Pro-Hac Vice application. Once completed Michael Rogovin will need to re-file the Consent/Declination form himself. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2022) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Chana Laufer.. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 9/29/2022) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 10/11/2022. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Anthony Bates, Egon Durban, Karen Dykstra, Kenneth Denman, Marianne Brown, Michael Brown, Michael Dell, Nicole Anasenes, Paul Sagan, Rangarajan Raghuram, VMware, Inc.. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/6/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/13/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/23/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Chana Laufer (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons List of Defendants)(Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Bates, Egon Durban, Karen Dykstra, Kenneth Denman, Marianne Brown, Michael Brown, Michael Dell, Nicole Anasenes, Paul Sagan, Rangarajan Raghuram, VMware, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17520719.). Filed byChana Laufer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
