Cady v. City of Burlingame
| Thomas A. Cady |
| City of Burlingame |
| 4:2022cv06019 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Alex G Tse |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Certified copy of docket sheet and remand order mailed to San Mateo County Superior Court. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022) |
Filing 9
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 11/17/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE RE DOCKET NO. #7 . Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2023 and Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2023 02:00 PM. The 1/17 proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 11/1/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Objections due by 11/15/2022. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Re Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse: granting #2 Application. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/6/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2023 02:00 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thomas A. Cady. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal against City of Burlingame. Filed byThomas A. Cady. Consent/Declination due by 10/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cady v. City of Burlingame | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas A. Cady | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Burlingame | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
