Hill v. Agonone et al
| Cymeyon Hill |
| Officer J. Agonone, Officer A. Scotland, Officer N. Roman and Officer Richard Lavina |
| 4:2022cv06062 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC GRC |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Statement of Account. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2022) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/17/2022. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cymeyon Hill, CDCR # V53300.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. Agonone, Richard Lavina, N. Roman, A. Scotland. Filed byCymeyon Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
