D. v. Meta Platforms, Inc., et al
| D. D. |
| Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Snap, Inc., TikTok, Inc and ByteDance Inc. |
| 4:2022cv06205 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 COMPLAINT Master Short Form Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants. Filed by D. D. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garrett, Laura) (Filed on 4/4/2023) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew P Bergman (Bergman, Matthew) (Filed on 4/3/2023) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn Draper (Draper, Glenn) (Filed on 4/3/2023) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura R. Garrett (Garrett, Laura) (Filed on 4/3/2023) |
| Filing 6 Transcript of Proceedings held on 11/09/2022, before Judge Gonzalez Rogers. Court Reporter Irene L. Rodriguez, email address Irene_Rodriguez@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing., TRANSCRIPT COPY DELIVERED Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/15/2023. (Rodriguez, Irene) (Filed on 11/17/2022) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE. This case is reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for coordination with In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products, No. 4:22-md-03047 consistent with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Transfer Order and the Order Setting Initial Conference in this District. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ByteDance Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., Snap, Inc., TikTok, Inc. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Bilsborrow, James) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Personal Injuries, Jury Demand against Byte Dance Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., Snap, Inc., TikTok, Inc (Filing fee $402, receipt number ACANDC-17642695). Filed by D. D. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bilsborrow, James) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| Cases associated: Create association to 4:22-md-03047-YGR. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| DIRECT MEMBER CASE OPENED (MDL 3047): Opened in California Northern District as 4:22-cv-06205-YGR cc: JPMDL (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
