Sauls v. Warden of CTF et al
David L. Sauls |
Warden of CTF, S. Balli, J. Crews, K. Green, L. Martinez and H. Mosely |
4:2022cv06739 |
November 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC GRC |
Donna M Ryu |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 EXHIBIT G Medical Record filed by David L. Sauls. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2022) |
Filing 6 Letter from David L. Sauls. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by David L. Sauls. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2022) |
Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by David L. Sauls. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2022) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against S. Balli, J. Crews, K. Green, L. Martinez, H. Mosely, Warden of CTF. Filed byDavid L. Sauls. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - E, #2 Exhibit F - Part 1, #3 Exhibit F - Part 2, #4 Exhibits G - I, #5 Envelope)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.