Borodaenko v. Twitter, Inc.
| Dmitry Borodaenko and Abhijit Mehta |
| Twitter, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv07226 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Donna M Ryu |
| American with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #14 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff Abhijit Mehta to Arbitration, #15 MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Dmitry Borodaenko, Abhijit Mehta. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 12/23/2022)
|
|
Filing 16
CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE DOCKET NOS. #14 AND #15 . In the future, all filings should reflect Oakland not San Francisco Division. This case was transferred to Judge Gilliam in Oakland. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2022)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Twitter, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 1/4/2023. Replies due by 1/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 12/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Compel Plaintiff Abhijit Mehta to Arbitration filed by Twitter, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 1/4/2023. Replies due by 1/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Fidelma Callaghan, #2 Proposed Order)(Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 12/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 13
CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for February 21, 2023, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by February 14st. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-07226-HSG. The February 21st proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Signed by The Clerk on 12/19/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 11
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2022)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Twitter, Inc... (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 12/15/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Meckley , Brian D. Berry, Ashlee N. Cherry and Kassia Stephenson for Defendant Twitter, Inc. (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 12/15/2022)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Twitter, Inc.. Filed byDmitry Borodaenko, Abhijit Mehta. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 12/7/2022)
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/16/2022. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2022)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dmitry Borodaenko. Twitter, Inc. served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 11/30/2022)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Twitter, Inc.. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/8/2023 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/15/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/1/2022. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 11/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Twitter, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17735008.). Filed byDmitry Borodaenko. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 11/16/2022)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
