Dupraz et al v. DOES 1-10,
Plaintiff: Leonard Dupraz and Celeste Lee
Defendant: DOES 1-10,
Case Number: 4:2022cv07709
Filed: December 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #5 Administrative Motion for Early Discovery. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2023)
December 21, 2022 Filing 5 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for Early Discovery filed by Leonard Dupraz, Celeste Lee. Responses due by 1/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Newman, David) (Filed on 12/21/2022) Modified on 12/22/2022 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
December 13, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Leonard Dupraz, Celeste Lee.. (Newman, David) (Filed on 12/13/2022)
December 7, 2022 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/7/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2022)
December 7, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/21/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2022)
December 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1-10, ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17791345.). Filed by Leonard Dupraz, Celeste Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Newman, David) (Filed on 12/7/2022) Modified on 12/9/2022 (kmg, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dupraz et al v. DOES 1-10,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonard Dupraz
Represented By: David Michael Newman
Represented By: Kavon Adli
Represented By: Richard A. De Liberty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Celeste Lee
Represented By: David Michael Newman
Represented By: Kavon Adli
Represented By: Richard A. De Liberty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?