Hernandez v. City and County of San Francisco Recreation and Parks
| Juana L. Hernandez |
| City and County of San Francisco Recreation and Parks |
| 4:2023cv00575 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing and [Proposed] Order filed by Juana L. Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2023) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Juana L. Hernandez.. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2023) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/14/2023. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 4/26/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/17/2023 at 1:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Juana L. Hernandez. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2023) |
| Filing 1 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT against City and County of San Francisco Recreation and Parks. Filed by Juana L. Hernandez. Consent/Declination due by 2/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez v. City and County of San Francisco Recreation and Parks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Juana L. Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City and County of San Francisco Recreation and Parks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
