Terry v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Quiyanna Terry
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 4:2023cv00963
Filed: March 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER (as modified) Granting #12 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION. Status Report due by 8/15/2023. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/17/2023. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2023)
April 10, 2023 Filing 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wilson, Brianna) (Filed on 4/10/2023)
March 22, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan Forsey (Forsey, Morgan) (Filed on 3/22/2023)
March 20, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett David Young (Young, Brett) (Filed on 3/20/2023)
March 10, 2023 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for June 13, 2023, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by June 6th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:23-cv-00963-HSG. The June 13th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. NOTE REGARDING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES: All attorneys and pro se litigants appearing for a telephonic case management conference are required to dial-in at least 15 minutes before the hearing to check-in with the CRD. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2023) Modified on 3/10/2023 to correct typo (ndr, COURT STAFF).
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 03/09/2023. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 9, 2023 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 7, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Quiyanna Terry.. (Zurada, Martin) (Filed on 3/7/2023)
March 3, 2023 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2023)
March 3, 2023 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/17/2023. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2023)
March 3, 2023 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Starbucks Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Starbucks Corporation for Starbucks Corporation. (Wilson, Brianna) (Filed on 3/3/2023)
March 3, 2023 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Starbucks Corporation . (Wilson, Brianna) (Filed on 3/3/2023)
March 3, 2023 Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint by Starbucks Corporation. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terry v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quiyanna Terry
Represented By: Mark Thomas Freeman
Represented By: Mark Lain Venardi
Represented By: Martin Zurada
Represented By: Martin Jacek Zurada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Brianna Wilson
Represented By: Brett David Young
Represented By: Morgan P Forsey
Represented By: Tracey A Kennedy
Represented By: Morgan Forsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?