Johnson v. Anupa et al
Matthew Thomas Johnson |
George Anupa and Bruce Chan |
4:2023cv01078 |
March 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC CHC |
Jon S Tigar |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 REQUEST by Matthew Thomas Johnson. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2023) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Matthew Thomas Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2023) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Matthew Thomas Johnson -Updated (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2023) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against George Anupa, Bruce Chan. Filed byMatthew Thomas Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2023) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 4/17/2023. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Matthew Thomas Johnson. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George Anupa, Bruce Chan (Filing fee $ 402.). Filed byMatthew Thomas Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.