Craft v. Musk et al
| Christopher D. Craft, Sr. |
| Elon Musk and Twitter Platform |
| 4:2023cv01644 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 5/18/23. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Dismissal. Plaintiff may file an objection to this recommendation no later than fourteen (14) days from the date on which they are served a copy of this Report and Recommendation. THIS CASE SHALL BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on May 18, 2023. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy placed in O:drive for mailing on 5/18/2023 Modified on 5/18/2023 (klh, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 5/8/2023. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive for mailing on 4/24/2023. |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL. Show Cause Response due by 5/9/2023. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on April 12, 2023. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy mailed on 4/12/2023 Modified on 4/12/2023 (klh, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff Craft, Sr., shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 4/20/2023. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive for mailing on 4/6/2023 |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/7/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/14/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:23-cv-02351. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Northern District of California.(rdz) |
|
Filing 5
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case in the Southern District of New York. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/27/23) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sgz) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/21/2023) (vn)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Christopher D. Craft, Sr. consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Christopher D. Craft, Sr. (sac) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Christopher D. Craft, Sr. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elon Musk, Twitter Platform. Document filed by Christopher D. Craft, Sr. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
