Smith-Stewart v. Kijakazi
| Paul Smith-Stewart |
| Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) |
| 4:2023cv02010 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SSA Administrative Transcript Notice of Lodging Transcript of the Certified Administrative Record in Electronic Form by Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attachments: #1 Part 1, #2 Part 2, #3 Part 3, #4 Part 4, #5 Part 5, #6 Part 6, #7 Part 7, #8 Part 8)(Lo, Michelle) (Filed on 6/23/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kilolo Kijakazi.. (Highland, Erin) (Filed on 5/10/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect PDF attached. Document is not a Consent/Decline form. [err201] This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #7 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge filed by Kilolo Kijakazi. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. See #4 [ PROCEDURAL ORDER FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY DECISION, and Supplemental Rules for Social Security Action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). [err101] This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #5 Proposed Summons filed by Paul Smith-Stewart (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2023) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kilolo Kijakazi.. (Highland, Erin) (Filed on 5/9/2023) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Paul Smith-Stewart.. (McCombs, Nancy) (Filed on 5/9/2023) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (McCombs, Nancy) (Filed on 5/9/2023) |
| Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/11/2023. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2023) |
| Filing 2 FEE PAID (Filing Fee: $402.00; Tracking ID 76409407707). (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2023) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2023: #1 Pay.gov Confirmation) (slh, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISION OF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (Administrative Procedure Act Case) against Commissioner of Social Security. Filed by Paul Smith-Stewart. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(McCombs, Nancy) (Filed on 4/26/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Filing fee not paid. Please pay the filing fee through Pay.gov by clicking on Civil > Other Documents > New Case Filing Fee in CM/ECF. Or submit Forma pauperis application.[err701]This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Paul Smith-Stewart (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
