Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco
| James Ellis Johnson |
| City and County of San Francisco |
| 4:2023cv02110 |
| May 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In-Person Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/28/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 13
Renotice motion hearing re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the alternative for a More Definite Statement (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Related document(s) #11 ) (Mills, Steven) (Filed on 6/28/2023) Modified on 6/28/2023 (slh, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Reset Hearing as to #11 Defendants Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)), See Docket No. #13 : Motion Hearing set for 9/28/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2023)
|
|
Filing 12
CLERK'S NOTICE Re Docket No. #11 . (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the alternative for a More Definite Statement (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed by City and County of San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 8/17/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 7/10/2023. Replies due by 7/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mills, Steven) (Filed on 6/26/2023) Modified on 6/28/2023 (slh, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 10
Order by Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr granting #9 Administrative Motion Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint.(ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 9
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint, filed by City and County of San Francisco. Responses due by 5/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Steven A. Mills, #2 Proposed Order)(Mills, Steven) (Filed on 5/19/2023)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE: A Joint Case Management Statement due by August 8, 2023. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for August 15, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The August 15th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.NOTE: All attorneys and pro se litigants appearing for a telephonic case management conference are required to dial-in at least 15 minutes before the hearing to check-in with the CRD.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. Case Management Statement due by 8/8/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/15/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Telephonic Only. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 05/16/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Ellis Johnson. City and County of San Francisco served on 5/4/2023, answer due 5/25/2023. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2023)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by James Ellis Johnson. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2023)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to City and County of San Francisco. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/9/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/16/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City and County of San Francisco (Filing fee $ 402; Receipt No. 311164317). Filed by James Ellis Johnson. Consent/Declination due by 5/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2023) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/1/2023: #3 Exhibit) (slh, COURT STAFF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Ellis Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City and County of San Francisco | |
| Represented By: | Steven Arthur Mills |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
