Prince George's County Board of Education v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
Prince Georges County Board of Education |
Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc., Siculus Inc, Facebook Operations, LLC, Instagram, LLC., Snap Inc., Tiktok Inc., TikTok Ltd, TikTok LLC, Bytedance Ltd, ByteDance Inc., Google LLC and YouTube LLC |
4:2023cv02846 |
June 8, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Maryland; Case Number 8:23-cv-01282. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL-3047: District of Maryland, 8:23-cv-01282, Prince George's County Board of Education v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 4:23-cv-02846-YGR pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order CT0-11 cc: JPMDL. Cases associated: Create association to 4:22-md-03047-YGR. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2023) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Summons Issued 21 days as to ByteDance, Inc., Bytedance, LTD., Facebook Operations, LLC,, Facebook Payments Inc., Google LLC., Instagram, LLC., Meta Platforms, Inc., Siculus, Inc., Snap, Inc., TikTok, Inc., TikTok, LLC, TikTok, LTD., YouTube, LLC. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Prince George's County Board of Education Proposed Summons to Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons to Defendant Facebook Payments, Inc., #2 Proposed Summons to Defendant Siculus, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons to Defendant Facebook Operations, LLC, #4 Proposed Summons to Defendant Instagram, LLC, #5 Proposed Summons to Defendant Snap Inc., #6 Proposed Summons to Defendant TikTok Inc., #7 Proposed Summons to Defendant TikTok, LTD., #8 Proposed Summons to Defendant TikTok, LLC, #9 Proposed Summons to Defendant Bytedance LTD., #10 Proposed Summons to Defendant Bytedance Inc., #11 Proposed Summons to Defendant Google, LLC, #12 Proposed Summons to Defendant YouTube, LLC)(Federico, Philip) |
Filing 4 QC NOTICE: #2 Amended Complaint filed by Prince George's County Board of Education was filed incorrectly. Your document has been accepted as filed. No corrective action is required in regard to this filing. **Pursuant to Local Rule 102, the original complaint caption "shall contain the names and addresses of all parties and the county of residence of any Maryland party". (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #2 Amended Complaint filed by Prince George's County Board of Education was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Individual summons must be provided for each defendant. To correct this problem, file Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Summons to #2 . You can may file all summons as one entry. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Case Assigned to Judge Deborah L. Boardman. (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Prince George's County Board of Education. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons proposed)(Federico, Philip) Modified on 5/16/2023 (ols, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 1 -FILED IN ERROR- COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10600943.), filed by Prince George's County Board of Education. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed)(Federico, Philip) Modified on 5/16/2023 (ols, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.