Li v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Nina Xiaoyan Li
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc., MRL SAN FRANCISCO LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MERCK SHARP & DOHE LLC and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Case Number: 4:2023cv03347
Filed: July 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Referring Judge: Jeffrey S White
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION Relief from Untimely Jury Demand Pursuant to FRCP 39(b) and FRCP 6(b) filed by Nina Xiaoyan Li. Motion Hearing set for 9/22/2023 09:00 AM before Judge Jeffrey S. White. Responses due by 9/8/2023. Replies due by 9/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration In Support of Request for Relief From Untimely Jury Demand, #2 Proposed Order Granting Request for Relief from Untimely Jury Demand)(Kochan, Deborah) (Filed on 8/18/2023)
August 15, 2023 Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by Nina Xiaoyan Li (Kochan, Deborah) (Filed on 8/15/2023)
July 27, 2023 Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Nina Xiaoyan Li. (Kochan, Deborah) (Filed on 7/27/2023)
July 14, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MRL San Francisco LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. re #7 Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, (Lawler, Christin) (Filed on 7/14/2023)
July 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/13/2023. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2023 11:00 AM - Videoconference Only. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2023)
July 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 07/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2023)
July 13, 2023 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2023)
July 12, 2023 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by MRL San Francisco LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp... (Burton, Aceilya) (Filed on 7/12/2023)
July 11, 2023 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10/9/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/16/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2023)
July 5, 2023 Answer to Removed Complaint (See Doc No. #1 -exhibits 3-6) by MRL San Francisco LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2023)
July 5, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/19/2023. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2023)
July 5, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Mateo County Superior Court. Their case number is 23-CIV-02404. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18419582). Filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MRL San Francisco LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohe LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhs. 1 thru 7 to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Interested Parties) (Lawler, Christin) (Filed on 7/5/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Li v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nina Xiaoyan Li
Represented By: Deborah Marie Kochan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc.
Represented By: Christin Anne Lawler
Represented By: Aceilya G. Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MRL SAN FRANCISCO LLC
Represented By: Christin Anne Lawler
Represented By: Aceilya G. Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Represented By: Christin Anne Lawler
Represented By: Aceilya G. Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHE LLC
Represented By: Christin Anne Lawler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Represented By: Christin Anne Lawler
Represented By: Aceilya G. Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?