Tajik v. Jaddou et al
Arash Tajik |
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
4:2023cv03552 |
July 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Donna M Ryu |
Naturalization Application |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Arash Tajik (Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 9/11/2023) |
Filing 12 Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #11 Stipulation to Remand Case to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Signed on 8/10/2023.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Arash Tajik. (Lyerla, Christopher) (Filed on 8/7/2023) Modified on 8/7/2023 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas.. (Lyerla, Christopher) (Filed on 8/4/2023) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/17/2023. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2023) |
#Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: CHRISTOPHER T. LYERLA- The docket shows a different address from what is appearing on the document. Please update your personal profile on ECF. Re: #8 Notice of Appearance filed by Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2023) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Thomas Lyerla (Lyerla, Christopher) (Filed on 8/2/2023) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arash Tajik. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 7/25/2023, answer due 9/25/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 7/25/2023, answer due 9/25/2023. (Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 7/31/2023) |
Filing 6 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2023) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2023) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/1/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2023) |
Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Arash Tajik.. (Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 7/18/2023) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 7/18/2023) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus /Petition For Hearing On Naturalization (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18457326). Filed by Arash Tajik. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 7/18/2023) Modified on 7/19/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.