Marble VOIP Partners LLC v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
| Marble VOIP Partners LLC |
| Zoom Video Communications, Inc |
| 4:2023cv03619 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 98
Certificate of Interested Entities by Zoom Video Communications, Inc and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Liu, Anita) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 97
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Marble VOIP Partners LLC (Koning, Andrew) (Filed on 8/8/2023)
|
|
Filing 96
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #94 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Anita Liu. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 95
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #93 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Andrew M. Long. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 94
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Anita Liu ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18519587.) filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing for Anita Liu)(Liu, Anita) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 93
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Andrew M. Long ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18519524.) filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Long, Andrew) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 92
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #91 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Jason R. Mudd. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 91
Amended MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Jason R. Mudd ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18518074.) Filing fee previously paid on 8/7/2023 filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Mudd, Jason) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 90
CLERK'S NOTICE AS TO JASON R. MUDD. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the #88 Motion for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Jason R. Mudd is incomplete. Please review and comply with Local Rule 11-3 (a) and re-file your Application along with a true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 89
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #87 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Aaron E. Hankel. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 88
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Jason R. Mudd ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18518074.) filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Mudd, Jason) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 87
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Aaron E. Hankel ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18516550.) filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Hankel, Aaron) (Filed on 8/4/2023)
|
|
Filing 86
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE #85 Order setting Case Management Conference and Standing Orders by Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Gibeault, Neal) (Filed on 8/4/2023) Modified on 8/4/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 85
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/2/2023. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2023 11:00 AM - Videoconference Only. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2023)
|
|
Filing 84
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/12/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/19/2023 10:00 AM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2023)
|
|
Filing 83
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 07/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
|
|
Filing 82
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Montenegro, Mayela) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
|
|
Filing 81
Please disregard - duplicate text only entry deleted. See ECF No. 80.
|
|
Filing 80
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
|
|
Filing 79
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Marble VOIP Partners LLC.. (Koning, Andrew) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
|
|
Filing 78
NOTICE of Appearance by Neal R Gibeault (Gibeault, Neal) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
|
|
Filing 77
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Koning (Koning, Andrew) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
|
|
Filing 76
CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/31/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 75
Case transferred in from District of Kansas; Case Number 2:22-cv-02247. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 74
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #49 Motion to Transfer Case. This case shall be transferred to the Northern District of California. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on July 20, 2023. (mls)
|
|
Filing 73
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jason R. Mudd on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Mudd, Jason)
|
|
Filing 72
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting #71 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/13/2023. (amh)
|
|
Filing 71
Joint MOTION for Protective Order Renewed Motion for Entry of Amended Protective Order by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 70
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED - REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. re #49 Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit K, #2 Exhibit L, #3 Exhibit M, #4 Exhibit N, #5 Exhibit O, #6 Exhibit P)(Hankel, Aaron) Modified on 7/21/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 69
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of R. 26(a) Initial Disclosures by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 68
NOTICE OF SERVICE by Marble VOIP Partners LLC of Pltf's 1st Interrogatories, Pltf's 1st Requests for Production of Documents, Pltf's Initial Disclosures; Pltf's Claim Charts for Infringement of US Pat 7,376,129 (Zoom One & Zoom Rooms) (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 67
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Marble VOIP Partners LLC identifying None as corporate parent . (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 66
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on June 27, 2023. (mls)
|
|
Filing 65
ORDER denying without prejudice 63 Joint Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 6/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (kas)
|
|
Filing 64
RESPONSE by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC re #49 Motion to Transfer Case, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: LinkedIn pages of Zoom employees, #2 Exhibit B: LinkedIn pages of named inventors of '129 patent, #3 Affidavit Declaration of M. Barresi)(Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 63
Joint Motion Requesting the Entry of a Protective Order. In accordance with the Guidelines for Agreed Protective Orders, the parties jointly moved for the entry of the protective order by emailing a copy of their revised proposed order to the Magistrate Judge's chambers on June 16, 2022. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (ht)
|
|
Filing 62
ANSWER to #44 Answer to Amended Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Marble VOIP Partners LLC.(Kernell, James J. ) Modified on 6/16/2023 to correct filer (sz).
|
|
Filing 61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC's Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Venue Discovery (Doc. #50 ) is denied. Marble shall file its response to Zoom's motion to transfer within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Zoom's request to stay these proceedings is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 6/12/2023. (mam)
|
|
Filing 60
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 6/5/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 59
INITIAL AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PHASE SCHEDULING ORDER: See order for deadlines and settings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 6/5/2023. (ht)
|
|
Filing 58
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC, Counter Defendant Marble VOIP Partners LLC re: #50 Motion for Leave,, Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, and in Opposition to Defendant's Cross Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of its Motion to Transfer (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 57
ORDER granting #56 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Answer and Counterclaim. Plaintiff must answer or otherwise respond to the counterclaims by June 16, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 5/31/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 56
MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to #44 Defendant's Answer to Amended Complaint and Counterclaim by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (jsh)
|
|
Filing 55
RESPONSE by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. re #50 Motion for Leave,, Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, #49 Motion to Transfer Case, (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 54
ORDER finding as moot #53 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Proposed Protective Order and Proposed ESI Order. The court has not yet set deadlines for these submissions, so the parties may stipulate to this procedural discovery agreement under FED. R. CIV. P. 29(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 5/26/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (amh)
|
|
Filing 53
Joint MOTION for extension of time to submit proposed protective order and proposed ESI order by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 52
ORDER expediting briefing deadlines regarding #50 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Venue Discovery and Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue. Defendant's response shall be filed by 5/30/2023; Plaintiff may file a reply by 6/2/2023. Pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 7.1(d)(1), Defendant's response shall not exceed 10 pages; Plaintiff's reply shall not exceed 3 pages. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 5/23/23. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(ss)
|
|
Filing 51
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #50 MOTION for Leave to file to Conduct Limited Venue Discovery and Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Northern California by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC, Counter Defendant Marble VOIP Partners LLC(Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 50
MOTION for Leave to file to Conduct Limited Venue Discovery and Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to #49 Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Northern California by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC, Counter Defendant Marble VOIP Partners LLC (Kernell, James). Added MOTION for Extension of Time on 5/23/2023 and docket entry relationship (ca).
|
|
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #50 MOTION for Leave to file to Conduct Limited Venue Discovery and Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Northern California MOTION for Extension of Time. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ht)
|
|
Filing 49
MOTION to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Durling, #2 Declaration of Long, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J)(Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 48
ORDER granting #47 Joint Motion to Continue the Scheduling Conference. The scheduling conference is re-scheduled for June 5, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. The conference will be held via telephone. Participants should dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, then enter access code 3977627# and follow the prompts to join the call as a participant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 5/10/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 47
JOINT MOTION to Continue the FED. R. CIV. P. 16 Scheduling Conference by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 46
ORDER finding as moot #42 Joint Motion to Lift Stay and for Extension of Time to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order. The motion is mooted by the filing of an amended motion (ECF 43). Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 5/9/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 45
ORDER granting #43 Amended Joint Motion to Lift Stay and for Extension of Time to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order. The stay is hereby lifted. By May 12, 2023, the parties must submit (via email to the undersigned's chambers) a proposed scheduling order, using the form order available on the court's website. The FED. R. CIV. P. 16 scheduling conference is re-set for May 31, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. The conference will be held via telephone. Participants should dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, then enter access code 3977627#, and follow the prompts to join the call as a participant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 5/9/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 44
ANSWER to #27 First Amended Complaint AND COUNTERCLAIMS against Marble VOIP Partners LLC by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 43
AMENDED JOINT MOTION to Lift Stay and for Extension of Time to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 42
JOINT MOTION to Lift Stay and for Extension of Time to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant Zoom's Motion to Dismiss Marble's First Amended Complaint #29 is denied. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on April 24, 2023. (mls)
|
|
Filing 40
TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held 3/14/23 before Judge Julie A. Robinson, Court Reporter Dani Murray, 913-907-1434, dani_murray@ksd.uscourts.gov. Transcript purchased by: Mr. Hankel. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 calendar days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the party's intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy is located on our website at www.ksd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/20/2023. (dm)
|
|
Filing 39
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before District Judge Julie A. Robinson: IN COURT HEARING held on 3/14/2023. The court takes #29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim under advisement as set forth in full on the record. (Court Reporter Dani Murray.) (mig)
|
|
Filing 38
NOTICE of Hearing CHANGE: THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR THIS HEARING. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) In Court Hearing set for 3/14/2023 IS RESCHEDULED TO BEGIN AT at 10:30 AM in KC Courtroom 427 (JAR) before District Judge Julie A. Robinson. (ss)
|
|
Filing 37
ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING: In Court Hearing set for 3/14/2023 at 10:00 AM in KC Courtroom 427 (JAR) before District Judge Julie A. Robinson. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 1/31/23. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(ss)
|
|
Filing 36
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. re #29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit B) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 35
ORDER. The Court has reviewed the parties' respective responses to the #32 Notice and Order to Show Cause entered December 19, 2022, directing them to show cause, in writing, why the Court should not strike their respective briefs in support of and in response to Defendant's #29 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Given the nature of these patent infringement proceedings, and the confusion over the application of the D. Kan. Pat. Rules, which were not amended and refer to the page limitations in the previous version of D. Kan. Rule 7.1, the Court will not strike the parties' respective briefs. Instead, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court construes the parties' responses to the Order to Show Cause as requests for an extension of time to seek leave to exceed page limitations under D. Kan. Rule 7.1(d)(4). The Court grants the parties leave to exceed the page limitations for the previously filed briefs in support of and in response to Defendant's motion to dismiss; Defendant's reply brief shall be limited to 15 pages. The Court cautions the parties that they are now on notice of the procedural changes to the D. Kan. Rules, effective December 1, 2022, and that they should refer to those Rules going forward in these proceedings. Should any question arise with respect to future briefs filed in the case, the parties shall seek guidance from the Court at least 3 days prior to filing any such submissions. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 12/22/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(lml)
|
|
Filing 34
RESPONSE by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. re #32 Order to Show Cause. (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 33
RESPONSE re #32 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC and Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc., are each directed to show cause, in writing, on or before 12/21/2022, why the Court should not strike their respective briefs, Docs. 30 and 31, under D. Kan. Rule 7.1(d). The parties' responses to this Notice and Order to Show Cause shall be limited to three (3) pages. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 12/19/2022. (mam)
|
|
Filing 31
RESPONSE by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC re #29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: US Patent 7,376,129, #2 Exhibit 2: First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3: Declaration of Daniel Minoli) (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 30
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #27 First Amended Complaint by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 29
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #27 First Amended Complaint by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER finding as moot #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff has filed a #27 First Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 11/21/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lml)
|
|
Filing 27
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Zoom Video Communications, Inc., filed by Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: US Patent 7,376,129, #2 Exhibit 2: Patent Asmt Cvr Sheet & Asmt Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3: Zoom Phone Page, #4 Exhibit 4: Changing Zoom Phone Settings, #5 Exhibit 5: Zoom Meetings, #6 Exhibit 6: Inviting A SIP_H.323 Rm System, #7 Exhibit 7: Notice Letter, #8 Exhibit 8: Using Zoom Phone, #9 Exhibit 9: Sm Business VoiP Service Made Easy, #10 Exhibit 10: What is VoiP Phone, #11 Exhibit 11: VOIP Service from Zoom, #12 Exhibit 12: Inside Zoom's Infrastructure, #13 Exhibit 13: How Zoom's Hardware as Service Lets You Connect, #14 Exhibit 14: Zoom Hardware as Service, #15 Exhibit 15: Getting Started with Android, #16 Exhibit 16: Getting Started with iOS, #17 Exhibit 17: Getting Started with Zoom Phone, #18 Exhibit 18: Answering the Call, #19 Exhibit 19: Zoom Rooms PBX Support, #20 Exhibit 20: Managing Provisioned SIP-H323 Rooms, #21 Exhibit 21: Zoom Releases SIP-Connected Audio, #22 Exhibit 22: Enhanced Zoom Connector, #23 Exhibit 23: Connect to a Zoom Meeting from Conf Rm, #24 Exhibit 24: Starting Meeting from SIP_H323 Endpoint, #25 Exhibit 25: Starting/Joining Meeting as Host, #26 Exhibit 26: Pltf Claim Chart, Claim 22 of '129 Patent, #27 Exhibit 27: Pltf Infringement Contentions, Claim 1 of '129 Patent, #28 Exhibit 28: You Can Finally Trust Computer Audio w/Zoom, #29 Exhibit 29: System Requirements for iOS, iPadOS & Android, #30 Exhibit 30: Pltf Infringement Contentions, Claim 22 of '129 Patent, #31 Exhibit 31: Pltf Infringement Contentions, Claim 1 of '129 Patent, #32 Exhibit 32: Expert Declaration, #33 Exhibit A to Expert Declaration, #34 Exhibit B to Expert Declaration)(Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE OF CANCELLED HEARING: Scheduling Conference set for November 17, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. is cancelled. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER granting #24 Motion to Stay Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 10/21/2022. (ca)
|
|
Filing 24
RENEWED JOINT MOTION to Extend Planning and Scheduling Dates by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 23
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by B. Trent Webb on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Webb, B.)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #21 Unopposed Motion to Extend Planning and Scheduling Dates. The motion is granted to the extent it seeks an extension of deadlines set in the Initial Order Regarding Planning and Scheduling (ECF 14). The new deadlines are as follows. The parties must conduct their Rule 26(f) meeting by October 27 and submit their proposed scheduling order by November 8. The telephone scheduling conference is re-set for November 17, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. (CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 3977627). The motion is denied to the extent it seeks a stay pending a ruling on the pending motion to dismiss because it fails to address the stay factors. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 10/13/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 21
UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Planning and Scheduling Dates by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Kernell, James)
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Response deadline 11/18/2022.(ca)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or, Alternatively, to File an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's deadline is extended to 11/18/2022. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 10/5/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lml) Modified on 10/6/2022 to correct docket relationship. (ca)
|
|
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ht)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or, Alternatively, to file Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Andrew M. Long for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 9/26/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Anita Liu for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 9/26/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for attorney Andrew M. Long to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5875224.) by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for attorney Anita Liu to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5875216.) by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 14
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 11/2/2022 at 01:30 PM in Telephone ADM - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 3977627 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 10/12/2022. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 10/21/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 10/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 9/20/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(ht)
|
|
Filing 13
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent. (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Marble VOIP Partners LLC upon Zoom Video Communications, Inc. served on 6/24/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. shall now have until September 13, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/15/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 8
UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Hankel, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 , #5 , and #6 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice of attorneys Michael J. Barresi, Christopher J. Belter, and Michael A. Siem for Marble VOIP Partners LLC, pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4, for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 6/30/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (bal)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for attorney Michael A. Siem to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5814227.) by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit - Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 ECF Reg Form)(Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for attorney Christopher J. Belter to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5814219.) by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit - Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 ECF Reg Form)(Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for attorney Michael J. Barresi to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5814170.) by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit - Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 ECF Reg Form)(Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 3
AO FORM 120: REPORT on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Kernell, James)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5808817.), filed by Marble VOIP Partners LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: US Patent 7,376,129, #2 Exhibit 2: Patent Asmt Cvr Sheet & Asmt Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3: Zoom Phone Page, #4 Exhibit 4: Changing Zoom Phone Settings, #5 Exhibit 5: Zoom Meetings, #6 Exhibit 6: Inviting A SIP_H.323 Rm System, #7 Exhibit 7: Notice Letter, #8 Exhibit 8: Using Zoom Phone, #9 Exhibit 9: Sm Business VoiP Service Made Easy, #10 Exhibit 10: What is VoiP Phone, #11 Exhibit 11: VOIP Service from Zoom, #12 Exhibit 12: Inside Zoom's Infrastructure, #13 Exhibit 13: How Zoom's Hardware as Service Lets You Connect, #14 Exhibit 14: Zoom Hardware as Service, #15 Exhibit 15: Getting Started with Android, #16 Exhibit 16: Getting Started with iOS, #17 Exhibit 17: Getting Started with Zoom Phone, #18 Exhibit 18: Answering the Call, #19 Exhibit 19: Zoom Rooms PBX Support, #20 Exhibit 20: Managing Provisioned SIP-H323 Rooms, #21 Exhibit 21: Zoom Releases SIP-Connected Audio, #22 Exhibit 22: Enhanced Zoom Connector, #23 Exhibit 23: Connect to a Zoom Meeting from Conf Rm, #24 Exhibit 24: Starting Meeting from SIP_H323 Endpoint, #25 Exhibit 25: Starting/Joining Meeting as Host, #26 Exhibit 26: Pltf Claim Chart, Claim 22 of '129 Patent, #27 Exhibit 27: Pltf Infringement Contentions, Claim 1 of '129 Patent, #28 Exhibit 28: You Can Finally Trust Computer Audio w/Zoom, #29 Exhibit 29: System Requirements for iOS, iPadOS & Android, #30 Exhibit 30: Pltf Infringement Contentions, Claim 22 of '129 Patent, #31 Exhibit 31: Pltf Infringement Contentions, Claim 1 of '129 Patent)(Kernell, James)
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
