Royce v. City And County Of San Francisco
Plaintiff: Mr. Michael Royce and Michael Royce
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Case Number: 4:2023cv03643
Filed: July 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Hixson
Referring Judge: Jeffrey S White
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2023 Filing 11 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DUE DATE OF DEFENDANTS RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(a)] filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Wood, Lauren) (Filed on 9/13/2023)
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Discovery Order. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 09/11/2023. (rmilc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Providing counsel in the recently related case (Royce v. City And County Of San Francisco, 4:23-cv-03643-JSW) an opportunity to file any objections he may have to the Proposed Discovery Plan (dkt. 125 in 4:22-cv-01587-JSW (Keene et al) (**Lead Case**)) no later than 12:00 noon on Friday, September 8, 2023. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 09/06/2023. (rmilc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023) Modified on 9/6/2023 (rmilc2, COURT STAFF).
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 8/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2023)
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RELATING CASE. Case 23-cv-3643-TSH is related to 22-cv-1587-JSW. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/30/2023. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2023)
July 31, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to City and County of San Francisco. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
July 31, 2023 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Dean, Peter) (Filed on 7/31/2023)
July 24, 2023 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10/19/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2023)
July 24, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/7/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2023)
July 24, 2023 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Michael Royce . (Dean, Peter) (Filed on 7/24/2023)
July 24, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand no process) against City And County Of San Francisco (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18474534.). Filed by Michael Royce. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-2)(Dean, Peter) (Filed on 7/24/2023) Modified on 7/25/2023 (bar, COURT STAFF). Modified on 7/25/2023 (bar, COURT STAFF).
July 24, 2023 Electronic Filing Error Case can not be randomly assigned to Judge due to lack of completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please complete Civil Cover Sheet JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 10/2020) and file as a separate docket entry. Once completed Civil Cover Sheet has been filed case will be randomly assigned to judge. Re Re: #1 Complaint filed by Michael Royce (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Royce v. City And County Of San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Michael Royce
Represented By: Peter Joseph Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Royce
Represented By: Peter Joseph Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?