Thompson v. Allison et al
| Sekou Kwane Thompson |
| Kathleen Allison, Louis Martinez, C. Koeing, J. Ortega, T. Mak, A. Esparza, M. Creamer and A. Hernandez |
| 4:2023cv05079 |
| October 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC CHC |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sekou Kwane Thompson. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2023) |
| Filing 1 CLERKS NOTICE: Plaintiff failed to submit this S.1983 complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis through the email procedures required by General Order No. 76. If plaintiff does not, by the deadline below, either resubmit the documents through the email procedures or file a motion seeking permission to file the complaint by mail, this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Email resubmission deadline: 10/18/2023 (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 IFP, #3 Envelope) (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 10/14/2023 (ljf, COURT STAFF). |
| Docket sheet and Docket 1 emailed to CTF. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
