Sangster v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al
| Eileen Sangster |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Aruba Networks, LLC |
| 4:2023cv05438 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Aruba Networks, LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company identifying Other Affiliate Hewlett Packard Enterprise Philine B.V., Other Affiliate 3Com International, Inc. for Aruba Networks, LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Bhatia, Veena) (Filed on 10/23/2023) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aruba Networks, LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company; Other Affiliate Hewlett Packard Enterprise Philine B.V. for Aruba Networks, LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Hsueh, Michael) (Filed on 10/23/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 23CV422454. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18764795). Filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Aruba Networks, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Declaration, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Dal Cielo, Neda) (Filed on 10/23/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
