Kirk v. General Insurance Company of America et al
| James Kirk |
| General Insurance Company of America and Mandy Esrock |
| 4:2023cv05506 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by General Insurance Company of America. (Boos, Nicholas) (Filed on 10/25/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by General Insurance Company of America identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Corporate Parent Safeco Corporation, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation for General Insurance Company of America. (Boos, Nicholas) (Filed on 10/25/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of San Francisco County. Their case number is CGC-23-609159. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18775603). Filed by General Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boos, Nicholas) (Filed on 10/25/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
