Escobedo v. Merrill Gardens L.L.C.
| Elias Escobedo |
| Merrill Gardens L.L.C. |
| 4:2023cv05834 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. You are hereby notified that the Initial Case Management Conference will be held by Zoom Webinar. Joint Case Management Statement is due by 1/15/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2024 at 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygr Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at YGRCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than January 19, 2024 at 12:00 PM PST. General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2023) |
Filing 16
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 12/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2023)
|
|
Filing 15
RELATED CASE ORDER. 23-cv-05834-AMO is related to 23-cv-05188-YGR. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/13/2023. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2023)
|
| Filing 14 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 23-cv-5188 YGR and 23-cv-5834 AMO. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 12/7/2023. (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2023). |
| Filing 13 Clerk's Notice on Reassignment. You are noticed that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Martinez-Olguin's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/martinez-olguin-araceli-amo/. This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2024 no later than 12:00 PM PST. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/29/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to address the court or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at amocrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 2/27/2024 at 12:00 PM PST. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 11/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2023)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2023) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Merrill Gardens L.L.C. of Defendant's Certificate of Filing and Notice to State Court and Adverse Party of Removal of Action to Federal Court (O'Malley, Diane) (Filed on 11/27/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Merrill Gardens L.L.C... (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 11/21/2023) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen Brenna Roney (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 11/21/2023) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Eli Drummond (Drummond, Eli) (Filed on 11/14/2023) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob L Karczewski (Karczewski, Jacob) (Filed on 11/14/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/8/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/15/2024 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
| Answer to Removal Complaint Submitted as Exhibit C in #1 Notice of Removal by Merrill Gardens L.L.C.. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/27/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Merrill Gardens L.L.C. re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, (Botros, Samantha) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Merrill Gardens L.L.C. (Botros, Samantha) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa County Superior Court. Their case number is C23-02414. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18829932). Filed by Merrill Gardens L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rich Boberg, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Botros, Samantha) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
