Austin v. Georgetown University
Plaintiff: George Jarvis Austin
Defendant: Georgetown University
Case Number: 4:2023cv05836
Filed: November 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Lisa J Cisneros
Referring Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2024 Filing 40 RESPONSE re #36 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,,,,, NO NEED FOR COURT ORDER; CORRECTION TO JUDICIAL ERROR(S); ALREADY WITHDREW CASE NO NEED FOR ORDER REDUNDANT, AND MOOT (ONCE MR. AUSTIN CORRECTLY PROVIDED NOTICE PER RULE 41) by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit FRCP Rule 41 NOTICE per ECF Docket#36 Electronic Service Rule 5 "NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHDRAW ENTIRE CASE, WITHOUT COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41; Mr. Austin Self-Represented, Plaintiff, Pro Se, George Jarvis Austin provides notice of withdrawal or voluntary dismissal or this entire case 4:23-cv-05836-YGR under Rule 41 of FRCP without need of Judicial Order per Rule 41 of FRCP(A)(1)(A)(i - notice); Mr. Austin is able to address these ongoing Defendant Georgetown issues, and violations, in another manner (as well as is mindful of (repeated) demonstrated anti-Black male judicial misconduct, and anti-Black male animus-conduct, by this particular Judge and thus provides notice of voluntary dismissal or withdrawal of this entire case (4:23-cv-05836-YGR) as of 6:25 pm PST on 1.9.24. II. This Serves as Notice that because no Defendant Answer, nor Motion for Summary Judgment has been filed, Mr. Austin can without Court Order Voluntarily withdraw or Voluntarily Dismiss under FRCP Rule 41, and exercises his Rights to Do So. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41",, #2 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) (Sworn Affidavit) of this Rule 41(A)(1)(A) NOTICE of WITHDRAWAL OR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT NEED FOR COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41 per "per Department of Justice's (DOJ) "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert Legal Requirements of an Affidavit") Emailed Notice to Clerk and Court (In the abundance of caution I looped in the Ombudspersons of the Northern District ccd here.) "Why did this judge just issue an order from the Court when that wasn't necessary for a Rule 41 Notice of Voluntary Withdrawal or Dismissal? I, Mr. Austin, will issue a correction on the docket as this is an error on that judge's part (as has her pattern toward me, discriminatorily), although she notes in the order that it is in line with the notice for dismissal, the way she frames the issue is fundamentally, and legally, incorrect; per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures it is wrong. Her history of racial animus towards me points to a different motivation for why she would go out of her way to behave in that manner (when completely unnecessary).....(one can read between the lines on her particular motivation). Outside of placing a restraining order, or commencing an action, on that judge, What's the best way to ensure going forward I don't have deal with her (ideally at all, but especially her) going out of her way to interfere, discriminate (or harass) me in any of the proceedings going forward?")(Austin, George) (Filed on 1/10/2024)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/10/2024. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2024) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 10, 2024 Filing 38 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by George Jarvis Austin., AFFIDAVIT of Service for Courtesy Copy of Notice of FRCP Rule 41 WITHDRAWAL OR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL to Court (Oakland: Northern District) served on Oakland Courthouse, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor (Clerk); Delivered directly to Courtroom 1 on January 10, 2024 at 1:20 pm PST, filed by George Jarvis Austin., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by George Jarvis Austin (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Email With CLERK OF COURT Verifying Receipt (with various Court staff bcc'd as direct witnesses) Jan 10, 2024 at 5:35 PM, #2 Affidavit FRCP Rule 41 NOTICE per ECF Docket#36 Electronic Service Rule 5 "NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHDRAW ENTIRE CASE, WITHOUT COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41; Mr. Austin Self-Represented, Plaintiff, Pro Se, George Jarvis Austin provides notice of withdrawal or voluntary dismissal or this entire case 4:23-cv-05836-YGR under Rule 41 of FRCP without need of Judicial Order per Rule 41 of FRCP(A)(1)(A)(i - notice); Mr. Austin is able to address these ongoing Defendant Georgetown issues, and violations, in another manner (as well as is mindful of (repeated) demonstrated anti-Black male judicial misconduct, and anti-Black male animus-conduct, by this particular Judge and thus provides notice of voluntary dismissal or withdrawal of this entire case (4:23-cv-05836-YGR) as of 6:25 pm PST on 1.9.24. II. This Serves as Notice that because no Defendant Answer, nor Motion for Summary Judgment has been filed, Mr. Austin can without Court Order Voluntarily withdraw or Voluntarily Dismiss under FRCP Rule 41, and exercises his Rights to Do So. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41", #3 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) (Sworn Affidavit) of this Rule 41(A)(1)(A) NOTICE of WITHDRAWAL OR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT NEED FOR COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41 per "per Department of Justice's (DOJ) "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert Legal Requirements of an Affidavit")(Austin, George) (Filed on 1/10/2024)
January 9, 2024 Filing 37 SERVICE by Publication filed by George Jarvis Austin. Last publication date 1/9/2024 at 6:28 PM PST. COURTESY COPY FOR THE COURT in Progress - Affidavit to Be Filed; Once Complete (also shall be filed and served on all parties per electronic service per ECF System FRCP Rule 5(b)(2)(E)) (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service FRCP Rule 41 NOTICE per ECF Docket#36 Electronic Service Rule 5 "NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHDRAW ENTIRE CASE, WITHOUT COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41; Mr. Austin Self-Represented, Plaintiff, Pro Se, George Jarvis Austin provides notice of withdrawal or voluntary dismissal or this entire case 4:23-cv-05836-YGR under Rule 41 of FRCP without need of Judicial Order per Rule 41 of FRCP(A)(1)(A)(i - notice); Mr. Austin is able to address these ongoing Defendant Georgetown issues, and violations, in another manner (as well as is mindful of (repeated) demonstrated anti-Black male judicial misconduct, and anti-Black male animus-conduct, by this particular Judge and thus provides notice of voluntary dismissal or withdrawal of this entire case (4:23-cv-05836-YGR) as of 6:25 pm PST on 1.9.24. II. This Serves as Notice that because no Defendant Answer, nor Motion for Summary Judgment has been filed, Mr. Austin can without Court Order Voluntarily withdraw or Voluntarily Dismiss under FRCP Rule 41, and exercises his Rights to Do So. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41", #2 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) (Sworn Affidavit) of this Rule 41(A)(1)(A) NOTICE of WITHDRAWAL OR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT NEED FOR COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41 per "per Department of Justice's (DOJ) "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert Legal Requirements of an Affidavit")(Austin, George) (Filed on 1/9/2024)
January 9, 2024 Filing 36 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHDRAW ENTIRE CASE, WITHOUT COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41; Mr. Austin Self-Represented, Plaintiff, Pro Se, George Jarvis Austin provides notice of withdrawal or voluntary dismissal or this entire case 4:23-cv-05836-YGR under Rule 41 of FRCP without need of Judicial Order per Rule 41 of FRCP(A)(1)(A)(i - notice); Mr. Austin is able to address these ongoing Defendant Georgetown issues, and violations, in another manner (as well as is mindful of (repeated) demonstrated anti-Black male judicial misconduct, and anti-Black male animus-conduct, by this particular Judge and thus provides notice of voluntary dismissal or withdrawal of this entire case (4:23-cv-05836-YGR) as of 6:25 pm PST on 1.9.24. II. This Serves as Notice that because no Defendant Answer, nor Motion for Summary Judgment has been filed, Mr. Austin can without Court Order Voluntarily withdraw or Voluntarily Dismiss under FRCP Rule 41, and exercises his Rights to Do So. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 by George Jarvis Austin (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) (Sworn Affidavit) of this Rule 41(A)(1)(A) NOTICE of WITHDRAWAL OR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT NEED FOR COURT ORDER UNDER FRCP RULE 41 per "per Department of Justice's (DOJ) "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert Legal Requirements of an Affidavit")(Austin, George) (Filed on 1/9/2024)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER STRIKING FILING AND RESETTING DEADLINES. Reset Deadlines as to #22 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss due by 1/16/2024. Defendant's Reply due by 1/23/2024. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/9/2024. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2024) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 7, 2024 Filing 34 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Courtesy Copy to Court (Oakland: Northern District) served on Oakland Courthouse 4th Floor Clerk on December 26, 2023, filed by George Jarvis Austin., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by George Jarvis Austin (Austin, George) (Filed on 1/7/2024)
January 3, 2024 Filing 33 AMENDED COMPLAINT (SAC) Second Amended Complaint; Amendment "As a matter of Right" per FRCP Rule 15 - 64 pages in honor of Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI (70 pgs with Roman numeral introduction pages) and 188 numbered sections (for ease of reference) against All Defendants. Filed by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Affidavit, #3 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) & (Sworn) Affidavit for 64-page Second Amended Complaint (SAC) As a matter of right per FRCP Rule 15; 64 Pages In Honor of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,Title VI, Excluding Roman Numeral pages per Department of Justice's (DOJ) "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert Legal Requirements of an Affidavit", #4 Civil Cover Sheet ; 'Original' Jurisdiction; Federal Question(s), as filled in on cover sheet see check, arises under US Constitution, Equal Protection, 42 USC 1981, 13th, 14th Amend, and Title VI per 28 USC 1331; $15,000,000.00 minimum Demand)(Austin, George) (Filed on 1/3/2024)
January 3, 2024 Filing 32 AMENDED DOCUMENT by George Jarvis Austin. Amendment to #31 Affidavit SUPPLEMENT (FOR 64-Page SAC). (Austin, George) (Filed on 1/3/2024)
January 2, 2024 Filing 31 AFFIDAVIT (SUPPLEMENT) by George Jarvis Austin. (Austin, George) (Filed on 1/2/2024)
January 1, 2024 Filing 30 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Summons $15,000,000.00 minimum Demand; 'Original' Jurisdiction; Federal Question(s) arises under US Constitution, Equal Protection, 42 USC 1981, 13th, 14th Amend, and Title VI per 28 USC 1331)(Austin, George) (Filed on 1/1/2024)
December 31, 2023 Filing 29 MOTION to Compel MANDATORY, INITIAL DISCLOSURES PER GEORGETOWN'S OWN PUBLIC (AND PRIVATE) MULTIPLE ADMISSIONS OF FACT, IN ACCORD WITH CURRENT LAW WITH 4+ YEARS PAST DUE DEFENDANT DISCLOSURES 'AFTER' VIOLATING MR. AUSTINS EQUAL PROTECTION, 42 USC 1981; TITLE VI; 13th, & 14th AMEND. FEDERAL RIGHTS; (WITH ADVANCE NOTICE OF ADA ACCOMMODATION NEEDS DUE TO MR. AUSTIN'S PHYSICAL ONGOING INJURIES), MOTION to Produce , MOTION for Disclosure filed by George Jarvis Austin. Motion Hearing set for 2/6/2024 02:00 PM in Do Not Use Videoconference Only before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Responses due by 1/16/2024. Replies due by 1/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit (SWORN) MR. AUSTIN NEVER GAVE GEORGETOWN CONSENT, WRITTEN (AS MANDATED) NOR OTHERWISE, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) & (Sworn) Affidavit for 12-page Motion to Compel-Produce Materially Omitted Requisite Disclosures to Mr. Austin and Mr. Austin alone per Department of Justice's (DOJ) "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert Legal Requirements of an Affidavit")(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/31/2023)
December 31, 2023 Filing 28 AFFIDAVIT (SWORN) MR. AUSTIN NEVER GAVE GEORGETOWN CONSENT, WRITTEN (AS MANDATED) NOR OTHERWISE, THUS HIS FEDERAL, EQUAL PROTECTION (14th AMEND.; CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964; TITLE VI) AND 42 USC 1981 RIGHTS TO CONTRACT (13th AMEND.) HAVE BEEN AND ARE CONTINUALLY BEING VIOLATED (TO DATE). See DCKT#3;15;17 COMPARE & CONTRAST TO CONSENSUAL, PRE-ASKED FOR, KNOWING (NON-COMMERCIAL) RECORDING & USE OF LIKENESS, IMAGE, PHOTO, VIDEO, ETC. e.g. www.senate.ca.gov/media/20130814_267/video by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) & Sworn Affidavit per Department of Justice's (DOJ) "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert Legal Requirements of an Affidavit")(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/31/2023)
December 24, 2023 Filing 27 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #22 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint FOR THE COURT; FAC (Dckt#12) COMPLIES FULLY WITH RULE 8 FOR COMPLEX CASES; (i.e. JUST 1 of 5 FAC CAUSES OF ACTION COMMANDED 237 page 2023 SUPREME COURT RULING) filed byGeorge Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FAC) hyperlinked with Dckts: 11 Affidavit, 10 Affidavit, 9 Affidavit, 8 Affidavit, 7 Affidavit, (SIGNED); from the 111 pages of FAC written text (and photo affidavits; roman numerals), or paragraphs-sections numbered 1-188,, #2 Civil Cover Sheet $15,000,000.00 Minimum Demand; (Note FEDERAL QUESTION BOX CHECKED IN COVER SHEET),, #3 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) for 7 paragraph Opposition to Defendant's First Motion on this Case Highlighting for the Court Defendant Georgetown's Counsel Second Grave Mistake (To Pair With the First); "Mr. Austin Notes for the Court that Defendant Georgetown, and its counsel, has made its second grave error in the outset, in that this cases (4:23-cv-05836-YGR (LJC)) 111 page, 188 paragraph (for ease of reference), Operative Complaint, FAC (Dckt#12) pleading of extremely complex subject matter requiring a 237 page Supreme Court ruling (only a few months ago) for just 1 (Title VI; Equal Protection) of the 5 causes of action in this FAC, complies fully with Rule 8 pleading standards as well as has Original Federal Jurisdiction arises under Federal Law per U.S.C. 1331. See e.g. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., No. 20-1199, 148 (U.S. Jun. 29, 2023)")(Related document(s) #22 ) (Austin, George) (Filed on 12/24/2023)
December 24, 2023 Filing 26 NOTICE by George Jarvis Austin re #12 Amended Complaint, FOR THE COURT PER FAC (Dckt#12) COMPLIES WITH RULE 8 FOR COMPLEX CASES; (i.e. JUST 1 of 5 FAC CAUSES OF ACTION COMMANDED 237 page 2023 SUPREME COURT RULING) (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) Affidavit of this 7 paragraph Notice Highlighting for the Court Defendant Georgetown's Counsel Second Grave Mistake (To Pair With the First); "Mr. Austin Notes for the Court that Defendant Georgetown, and its counsel, has made its second grave error in the outset, in that this cases (4:23-cv-05836-YGR (LJC)) 111 page, 188 paragraph (for ease of reference), Operative Complaint, FAC (Dckt#12) pleading of extremely complex subject matter requiring a 237 page Supreme Court ruling (only a few months ago) for just 1 (Title VI; Equal Protection) of the 5 causes of action in this FAC, complies fully with Rule 8 pleading standards as well as has Original Federal Jurisdiction arises under Federal Law per U.S.C. 1331. See e.g. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., No. 20-1199, 148 (U.S. Jun. 29, 2023)")(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/24/2023)
December 20, 2023 Filing 25 Proposed Findings of Fact by George Jarvis Austin 12.20.23 7:12 p.m. PST formal complaint regarding ongoing Georgetown Federal law violations including material information omissions mandated to provide after violating Mr. Austin's Federal 42 USC 1981, Title VI, Equal Protection, etc. rights and continuing the facially discriminatory pattern, policy, and practice of anti-Black male discriminatory animus (with Court staff-personnel-leadership made privy to direct evidence communications-complaints as witness(es) - redacted for privacy purposes). (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) & Affidavit (with over 200+ direct witnesses of over 4+ years of formal complaints, and 'ongoing' Defendant Georgetown Federal law violations)(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/20/2023)
December 20, 2023 Filing 24 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #22 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint COURT HAS "ORIGINAL" JURISDICTION UNDER 1331 "FEDERAL QUESTION" (i.e. 'ongoing' FEDERAL LAW violations (Equal Protection (14th. Amend.; Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VI), and 42 USC 1981 (13th Amend) filed byGeorge Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FAC) hyperlinked with Dckts: 11 Affidavit, 10 Affidavit, 9 Affidavit, 8 Affidavit, 7 Affidavit, (SIGNED); from the 111 pages of FAC written text (and photo affidavits; roman numerals), or paragraphs-sections numbered 1-188, #2 Civil Cover Sheet $15,000,000.00 Minimum Demand; (Note FEDERAL QUESTION BOX CHECKED IN COVER SHEET), #3 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) for 7 paragraph Opposition to Defendant's First Motion on this Case; "Mr. Austin notes for the Court that Defendant has provided its own Affidavit in Opposition in its own first Motion (as defendant counsel errantly makes an inapplicable, or inapposite, argument for limits on Diversity jurisdiction utilization of a state law in a federal court [i.e. focused solely on use of Civ. Code 3344 in Federal Court for an out of state Defendant] incorrectly applied argument to an ongoing Original Federal Question case under 1331, violating federal law, without Civ. Code 3344, nor state law privacy, as a cause of action). See e.g. 28 U.S.C. 1331 (Federal question: The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.)")(Related document(s) #22 ) (Austin, George) (Filed on 12/20/2023)
December 20, 2023 Filing 23 NOTICE by George Jarvis Austin re #12 Amended Complaint, FOR THE COURT PER FAC (Dckt#12) PARAGRAPH #82, pg. 54 ORIGINAL FEDERAL JURISDICTION per U.S.C. 1331 due to Defendant Georgetown ' s ongoing FEDERAL LAW violations (Equal Protection (14th. Amend.; Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VI), and 42 USC 1981 (13th Amend)." (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) Affidavit of this 5 paragraph Notice Highlighting for the Court Defendant Georgetown's Counsel First Grave Mistake; "Mr. Austin Notes for the Court at the outset, as provided in FAC (Dckt#12) paragraph number #82, pg. 54 (of 111) of written text this cases (4:23-cv-05836-YGR (LJC)) Original Federal Jurisdiction per U.S.C. 1331 is due to Georgetowns ongoing violations of Mr. Austins Federal rights, as an admitted student- -whistleblower, including Federal Equal Protection (14th. Amend.; Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VI), and 42 USC 1981 (13th Amend).")(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/20/2023)
December 20, 2023 Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Georgetown University. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 1/30/2024 02:00 PM. Responses due by 1/3/2024. Replies due by 1/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Platt, Henry) (Filed on 12/20/2023)
December 20, 2023 Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. You are hereby notified that the Initial Case Management Conference will be held by Zoom Webinar. Joint Case Management Statement is due by 2/19/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/26/2024, at 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygr Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at YGRCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than February 23, 2024 at 12:00 PM PST. General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2023) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 12/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 RELATED CASE ORDER. 23-cv-05836-LJC is related to 19-cv-05631-YGR. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/20/2023. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2023) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
December 14, 2023 Filing 18 NOTICE by George Jarvis Austin re #2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, In honor of, and compliance with, Honorable Lisa J. Cisneros Standing Order D. Case Management #1;#3, Lawyer Development, Mr. Austin, (Self Represented, Pro Se, Litigant, without a Juris Doctor, nor having ever taken the bar and a Black man, proudly part of an historically underrepresented group) notes for the Court, in advance, that he will be filing a separate, individual, case management statement (especially provided Georgetowns ongoing discriminatory pattern, policy, and practice, pre and post personal service of process Dckt#14); The Individual, not Joint, Case Management Statement will address Georgetown's violations of Mr. George Jarvis Austin, an admitted Georgetown student, filing complaint(s) about Georgetowns 'ongoing' 1. Equal Protection 2. 42 USC 1981 3. Deceit, False Promises, Misrepresentations, Omissions and Actual Fraud (with Malice) 4. Negligence and 5. Bad Faith violations of his rights as witnessed by over 50+ separate persons (as well as other key requisite Case Management Statement Information) (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) & Affidavit)(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/14/2023)
December 14, 2023 Filing 17 Proposed Findings of Fact by George Jarvis Austin Georgetown's Leadership, including William Treanor, Dean-Executive VP, whom Mitch Bailin reports to directly, Written Confirmation of Receipt (Yet, still not 1 mandatory follow up step taken, nor mandatory provision of information provided).. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service From William Treanor, Dean, Executive Vice President, Confirming Receipt of Formal Complaints-Inquires that require detailed Georgetown defined procedure, response, and provision of information under current Federal, California, and D.C. law (on 10.12.23; as well as previously, 1 example), #2 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations))(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/14/2023)
December 14, 2023 Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed COURTESY COPY in Progress - Affidavit to Be Filed; Once Complete Acknowledgement filed by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service, #2 Affidavit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations))(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/14/2023)
December 8, 2023 Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT re #3 Affidavit,, Documented Formal Complaints to Georgetown Leadership Pre & Post Service of Process Dckt#14 - demonstrating illegal pattern, practice and policy, in real time (as a whistle-blower) by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) & Affidavits (including embedded, time-stamped documents; communications))(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/8/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Operative Complaint; Summons; Affidavits; Civil Cover Sheet; Proof SIGNED; DATED; PERSONAL SERVICE BY PROCESS SERVER served on Georgetown University (General Counsel; Vice President Office) on 11/29/2023, filed by George Jarvis Austin., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by George Jarvis Austin re #3 Affidavit,, #12 Amended Complaint, , SUMMONS Returned Executed by George Jarvis Austin. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit & Proof of Service, #2 Affidavit (Photographic Proof of Service on Location).)(Austin, George) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
November 23, 2023 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT re #12 Amended Complaint, & NOTICE Service of Process Ordered; In Progress (shall file affidavit; proof of service when service completed) by George Jarvis Austin. (Austin, George) (Filed on 11/23/2023)
November 23, 2023 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FAC) hyperlinked with Dckts: #11 Affidavit, #10 Affidavit, #9 Affidavit, #8 Affidavit, #7 Affidavit, (SIGNED) against All Defendants. Filed by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) from the 111 pages of written text (and photo affidavits; roman numerals), or paragraphs-sections numbered 1-188, #2 Civil Cover Sheet $15,000,000.00 Minimum Demand)(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/23/2023)
November 22, 2023 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT re #7 Affidavit, #10 Affidavit, #9 Affidavit, #8 Affidavit, (SIGNED) per AMENDED COMPLAINT Paragraphs-Sections #161-188 by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) for paragraphs-sections #161-188)(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
November 22, 2023 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT re #7 Affidavit, #9 Affidavit, #8 Affidavit, (SIGNED) per AMENDED COMPLAINT Paragraphs-Sections #121-160 by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) for paragraphs-sections #121-160)(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
November 22, 2023 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT re #7 Affidavit, #8 Affidavit, (SIGNED) per AMENDED COMPLAINT Paragraphs-Sections #81-120 by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) for paragraphs-sections #81-120)(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
November 22, 2023 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT re #7 Affidavit (SIGNED) per AMENDED COMPLAINT Paragraphs-Sections #41-81 by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) for paragraphs-sections # 41-81)(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
November 22, 2023 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT (SIGNED) per AMENDED COMPLAINT Paragraphs-Sections #1-40 by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) for paragraphs-sections # 1-40)(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
November 21, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by George Jarvis Austin.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/21/2023)
November 20, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Georgetown University. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2023)
November 20, 2023 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Austin, George) (Filed on 11/20/2023)
November 14, 2023 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Complaint,, Documented Formal Complaints to Georgetown Leadership, President, Dean, General Counsel, IDEAA, etc. with over 100+ witnesses by George Jarvis Austin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit & Affidavit - Documented Formal Complaints (Whistle-blower) Communications, Requests, Complaints, Escalations to Key Stakeholders, Officers, Decision Makers, and Over 100+ Eyewitnesses, #2 Exhibit & Affidavit (Demonstrated Deliberate Indifference), #3 Affidavit & Affidavit (Demonstrated Deliberate Indifference - with CRD included to view personally; directly in real time))(Austin, George) (Filed on 11/14/2023)
November 13, 2023 Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/8/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/15/2024 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 13, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Georgetown University (Filing fee $ 402.). Filed by George Jarvis Austin. Consent/Declination due by 11/27/2023. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/13/2023: #1 part 2) (far, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/13/2023: #2 part 3) (far, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/13/2023: #3 part 4) (far, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/13/2023: #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Receipt) (far, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Austin v. Georgetown University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Jarvis Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Georgetown University
Represented By: Henry Adam Platt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?