Soto De La Rosa v. Murray
| Ron Murray |
| Jose Isabel Soto De La Rosa |
| Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Current or Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Current or Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and Current or Acting United States Attorney General |
| 4:2023cv06461 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC GRC |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS #2 ; DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED; AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL #3 : Respondents' Consent/Declination due by 2/16/2024; Respondents' Show Cause Response, Habeas Answer or Motion to Dismiss due by 3/19/2024; Petitioner's Traverse and opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion due by 4/16/2024; Respondents' Reply due by 4/30/2024. The Clerk is directed to substitute Ron Murray, the warden of Mesa Verde Detention Facility, as Respondent in this action. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/19/2024. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Documents emailed to United States Department of Justice per order at docket #7 . (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2024) |
| Documents emailed to Attorney General of the State of California per order at docket #6 . (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2024) |
Filing 6
ORDER ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS #2 ; DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED; AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL #3 : Respondents' Consent/Declination due by 2/13/2024; Respondents' Show Cause Response, Habeas Answer or Motion to Dismiss due by 3/18/2024; Petitioner's Traverse and opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion due by 4/15/2024; Respondents' Reply due by 4/29/2024. The Clerk is directed to substitute Ron Murray, the warden of Mesa Verde Detention Facility, as Respondent in this action. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/16/2024. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jose Isabel Soto De La Rosa. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2023) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Jose Isabel Soto De La Rosa. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jose Isabel Soto De La Rosa. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed by Jose Isabel Soto De La Rosa. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
