Dismuke v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Sasha B. Dismuke |
City and County of San Francisco, Lillian Chow, Katharine Hobin Porter and Carol Isen |
4:2023cv06505 |
December 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
Jeffrey S White |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 2/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 9 ORDER RELATING CASE. Case 23-cv-06505-TSH is related to case 22-cv-01587-JSW. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/1/2024. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2024) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Shapiro, Adam) (Filed on 1/24/2024) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Lillian Chow served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024; City and County of San Francisco served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024; Carol Isen served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024; Katharine Hobin Porter served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2024) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Lillian Chow, City and County of San Francisco, Carol Isen, Katharine Hobin Porter. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 City, #2 USM-285 Chow, #3 USM-285 Porter, #4 USM-285 Isen)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2023) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: ECF REGISTRATION (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 3/14/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/21/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sasha B. Dismuke. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2023) |
Filing 1 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT against All Defendants. IFPP. No Process. Filed by Sasha B. Dismuke. Consent/Declination due by 1/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.