In re Ex Parte Application of APPLE INC.; APPLE DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL; AND APPLE RETAIL GERMANY B.V. & CO. KG
| RPX Corporation |
| Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International and Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG |
| 4:2023mc80293 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REMARK: The court has received Docket No. #7 Applicants' Notice of Withdrawal of ex parte Application for an Order. No court order is required. The parties are hereby notified that this matter is terminated pursuant to the Applicants' Notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2023). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Apple Distribution International, Apple Inc., Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG re #1 Ex Parte Application (Miscellaneous Case Opening), (Do, Kim) (Filed on 11/21/2023) |
Filing 6
ORDER re: Ex Parte Application for Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/21/2023. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2023)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Apple Distribution International, Apple Inc., Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG (Amended) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Do, Kim) (Filed on 11/9/2023) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Apple Distribution International, Apple Inc., Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG identifying Corporate Parent Apple Inc. for Apple Distribution International, Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG; Corporate Parent No Parent Corporation and No Publicly Held Corporation Owns 10% or More of its Stock for Apple Inc.. (Do, Kim) (Filed on 11/7/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/20/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by Apple Distribution International, Apple Inc., Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Unredacted Version of Ex Parte Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1728 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings and Supporting Memorandum, #3 Unredacted Version of Declaration of Nora Q.E. Passamaneck, #4 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 2, #5 Certificate of Service)(Do, Kim) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
| Filing 1 EX PARTE APPLICATION for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1728 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings and Supporting Memorandum against RPX Corporation ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number ACANDC-18809358.). Filed by Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG, Apple Distribution International, Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nora Q.E. Passamaneck in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Do, Kim) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
