Matthews v. Apple, Inc. California Corporation
| Michael Matthews |
| APPLE, INC. |
| 4:2024cv00272 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Second Joint Stipulation to Extend Defendant Apple Inc.s Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by APPLE, INC., Michael Matthews (Ord, Isabelle) (Filed on 3/6/2024) Modified on 3/7/2024 (kmm2, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 23 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Case Management Statement due by 4/30/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/7/2024 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A combined list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at JSTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than May 6, 2024 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 4/30/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/7/2024 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2024) |
| Filing 22 Case Reassigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings re #20 Order of Recusal. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 2/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2024) |
| Filing 21 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2024) |
Filing 20
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/16/2024. (blflc3, COURT STAFF)(Filed on 2/16/2024)
|
| Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 7/3/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/11/2024 11:00 AM before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2024) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 2/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2024)
|
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2024) |
| Filing 16 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by APPLE, INC. (Ord, Isabelle) (Filed on 2/14/2024) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by APPLE, INC... (Ord, Isabelle) (Filed on 2/14/2024) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT APPLE INC.S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by APPLE, INC. and Michael Mathews. (Ord, Isabelle) (Filed on 2/14/2024) Modified on 2/15/2024 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Doori C. Song (Song, Doori) (Filed on 2/14/2024) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Guadalupe Raymond Laguna (Laguna, Guadalupe) (Filed on 2/14/2024) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeanette Eva Thurber Barzelay (Barzelay, Jeanette) (Filed on 2/14/2024) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Isabelle Louise Ord (Ord, Isabelle) (Filed on 2/14/2024) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #8 Application for Admissio of Attorney for Pro Hac Vice for Karl J. Breyer, Counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 1/31/2024. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2024)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-19078756.) filed by Michael Matthews. (Breyer, Karl) (Filed on 1/31/2024) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael Matthews re #5 Summons Issued (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service of Summons)(Boyer, Bradley) (Filed on 1/25/2024) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/9/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/16/2024 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2024) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to APPLE, INC.. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2024) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/31/2024. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2024) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Michael Matthews re #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons (Boyer, Bradley) (Filed on 1/16/2024) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Boyer, Bradley) (Filed on 1/16/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Apple, Inc. California Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19025916.). Filed by Michael Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyer, Bradley) (Filed on 1/16/2024) Modified on 1/17/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
