Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
| Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland |
| Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc., Facebook Operations, LLC, Instagram LLC, Siculus, Inc., Snap, Inc., TikTok, Inc., Tiktok LTD, TikTok LLC, ByteDance, Inc., ByteDance Ltd., Google LLC and YouTube LLC |
| 4:2024cv00926 |
| February 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland. ByteDance Ltd. served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; TikTok LLC served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Tiktok LTD served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Debrosse Zimmermann, Diandra) (Filed on 3/26/2024) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland. ByteDance, Inc. served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Facebook Operations, LLC served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Facebook Payments, Inc. served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Google LLC served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Instagram LLC served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Meta Platforms, Inc. served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Siculus, Inc. served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; Snap, Inc. served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; TikTok, Inc. served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024; YouTube LLC served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Executed Summons)(Debrosse Zimmermann, Diandra) (Filed on 3/11/2024) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed by Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland. (Debrosse Zimmermann, Diandra) (Filed on 3/8/2024) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance, Inc., Facebook Operations, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc., Google LLC, Instagram LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., Siculus, Inc., Snap, Inc., TikTok LLC, TikTok, Inc., Tiktok LTD, YouTube LLC. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2024) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Debrosse Zimmermann, Diandra) (Filed on 2/21/2024) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19131969.). Filed by Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Debrosse Zimmermann, Diandra) (Filed on 2/16/2024) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED:, Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-00926-YGR cc: JPMDL (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
